Genus: Fragaria

Fragaria
Photo by Gerry Moore

By Science Staff

Not peer reviewed

Last Modified 02/06/2013

Back to Rosaceae

Nomenclature

Fragaria Linnaeus, Sp. Pl. 1: 494. 1753.

List of Fragaria Species

References to Fragaria

  • Ashman, T. L. 2005. The limits on sexual dimorphism in vegetative traits in a gynodioecious plant. Amer. Naturalist 166: S5-S16.
  • Ashman, T. L. et.al. 2005. The scent of a male: The role of floral volatiles in pollination of a gender dimorphic plant. Ecology 86: 2099-2105.
  • Ashman, T. L.; Cole, D. H.; Bradburn, M. 2004. Sex-differential resistance and tolerance to herbivory in a gynodioecious wild strawberry. Ecology 85: 2550-2559.
  • Ashman, T. L.; King, E. A. 2005. Are flower-visiting ants mutualists or antagonists? A study in a gynodioecious wild strawberry. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 891-895.
  • Bishop, E. J. et.al. 2010. Sex-allocation plasticity in hermaphrodites of sexually dimorphic Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae). Botany 88: 231-240.
  • Boileau, F.; Crete, M.; Huot, J. 1994. Food habits of the black bear, Ursus americanus, and habitat use in Gaspesie Park, eastern Quebec. Canad. Field-Naturalist 108: 162-9. (French summary)
  • Braun, J.; Brooks, G. R. 1987. Box turtles (iTerrapene carolina) as potential agents for seed dispersal. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 117: 312-8.
  • Cook, D. B.; Hamilton, W. J. 1944. The ecological relationships of red fox food in eastern New York. Ecology 25(1): 91-104.
  • Hancock, J. F. et.al. 2004. Taxonomic variation among North and South American subspecies of Fragaria Virginian Miller and Fragaria chiloensis (L.) Miller. Canad. J. Bot. 82: 1632-1644.
  • Harrison, R. E. et.al. 1997. Morphological and molecular variation among populations of octoploid Fragaria virginiana and F. chiloensis (Rosaceae) from North America. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 612-620.
  • House, H. D. 1921. Nomenclatural notes on certain American plants. I. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 7: 126-35.
  • Jackson, G. 1926. The morphology and anatomy of the flowers of Rosa and certain closely related genera. M.S. Thesis Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY56 figs. + 33 p.
  • Kalla, S. E.; Ashman, T. L. 2002. The effects of pollen competition on progeny vigor in Fragaria virginiana (Rosaceae) depend on progeny growth environment. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163: 335-340.
  • Mabberley, D. J. 2002. Potentilla and Fragaria (Rosaceae) reunited. Telopea 9: 793-801.
  • Mansfeld, R. 1939. Zur Nomenklatur der Farn- und Blutenpflanzen Deutschlands. V. Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. 46: 286-309.
  • Potter, D.; Luby, J. J.; Harrison, R. E. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among species of Fragaria (Rosaceae) inferred from non-coding nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 25: 337-348.
  • Rohde, A. S.; Ashman, T. L. 2010. Effects of florivory and inbreeding on reproduction in hermaphrodites of the wild strawberry Fragaria virginiana. Int. J. Plant Sci. 171: 175-184.
  • Sterling, C. 1953. Developmental anatomy of the fruit of Prunus domestica. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 80: 457-477. (Other genera also)