New York Metropolitan Flora

Family: Rosaceae

Prunus serotina

By Science Staff

Not peer reviewed

Last Modified 03/11/2013

Nomenclature

List of Rosaceae Genera

References to Rosaceae

  • Abrahamson, W. G. 1975. Reproductive strategies in dewberries. Ecology 56(3): 721-6.
  • Abrahamson, W. G. 1975. Reproduction in <em>Rubus hispidus</em> L. in different habitats. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 93: 471-8.
  • Abrams, M. D.; Kloeppel, B. D.; Kubiske, M. E. 1992. Ecophysiological and morphological responses to shade and drought in two contrasting genotypes of <em>Prunus serotina</em>. Tree Physiology 10: 343-55.
  • Akhunova, S. S. 1987. On systematic significance of pericarp anatomical characters in some members of the genus <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae). Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Lenengrad) 72(6): 778-80. (In Russian)
  • Aldasoro, J. J.; Aedo, C.; Navarro, C. 1998. Pome anatomy of Rosaceae subfam. Maloideae, with special reference to <em>Pyrus</em>. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 518-527.
  • Aldous, S. E. 1941. Food habits of chipmunks. J. Mammal. 22: 18-24.
  • Alexander, E. J. 1945. <em>Rubus linkianus</em>. Addisonia 22: 35-6.
  • Alexander, E. J. 1944. <em>Photinia villosa</em>. Addisonia 22: 27-8.
  • Alexander, E. J. 1960. <em>Malus baccata</em>. Addisonia 24: 1.
  • Alexander, E. J. 1960. <em>Crataegus chrysocarpa phoenicea</em>. Addisonia 24: 7.
  • Alice, L. A. et.al. 2001. Hybridization and gene flow between distantly related species of <em>Rubus</em> (Rosaceae): evidence from nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transribed spacer region sequences. Syst. Bot. 26: 769-778.
  • Alice, L. A.; Campbell, C. S. 1999. Phylogeny of <em>Rubus</em> (Rosaceae) based on nuclear ribosomal DNA internal transcribed spacer region sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 86: 81-97.
  • Allard, H. A. 1944. Second year sprouts of black cherry, <em>Prunus serotina</em>, fruiting. Castanea 9(5-6): 117.
  • Amthor, J. S.; Gill, D. S.; Bormann, F. H. 1990. Autumnal laef conductance and apparent photosythesis by saplings and sprouts in a recently disturbed northern hardwood forest. Oecologia 84: 93-8.
  • Anderson, E.; Ames, O. 1932. Botanizing from an airplane. Bull. Popular Inform. Arnold Arbor. 6: 37-44. (Distribution of P. maritima along New England coast)
  • Anderson, E.; Judd, W. H. 1932. <em>Rosa rugosa</em> and its hybrids. Bull. Popular Inform. Arnold Arbor. 6: 29-35.
  • Anderson, G. J. 1980. New England note: change in status for <em>Prunus gravesii</em>. Rhodora 82(830): 375-6.
  • Anderson, M. D. 2001. <em>Dasiphora floribunda</em>. ()
  • Angell, V. C. 1933. The <em>Crataegi</em> of Grand Rapids, Mighigan, and vicinity. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci. 17: 1-50.
  • Anonymous 1883. Proceedings of the Torrey Club. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 10: 36.
  • Anonymous 1892. Proceedings of the club. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 19: 139-40.
  • Anonymous 1975. Wild plum, <em>Prunus americana</em>, family Rosaceae. Morton Arbor. Quart. 11(3): 42-3.
  • Anonymous 1901. Field days of the Torrey Botanical Club. Torreya 1: 132.
  • Anonymous 1887. Proceedings of the Club. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 14: 88.
  • Anonymous 1889. Proceedings of the Club. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 16: 123-4.
  • Anonymous 1977. Dotted hawthorn, <em>Crataegus punctata</em>. Rose family (Rosaceae). Morton Arbor. Quart. 13(1): 15.
  • Anstey, J. H. 1966. Prediction of full bloom date for apple, pear, cherry, peach and apricot from air temperature data. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 88: 57-66.
  • Antonius, K.; Nybom, H. 1994. DNA fingerprinting reveals significant amounts of genetic variation in a wild raspberry <em>Rubus idaeus</em> population. Molec. Ecol. 3: 177-80.
  • Ashe, W. W. 1904. East American thorns. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 20: 47-56.
  • Ashe, W. W. 1899. New east American species of <em>Crataegus</em>. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 16: 70-9.
  • Ashman, T. L. 2005. The limits on sexual dimorphism in vegetative traits in a gynodioecious plant. Amer. Naturalist 166: S5-S16.
  • Ashman, T. L. et.al. 2005. The scent of a male: The role of floral volatiles in pollination of a gender dimorphic plant. Ecology 86: 2099-2105.
  • Ashman, T. L.; Cole, D. H.; Bradburn, M. 2004. Sex-differential resistance and tolerance to herbivory in a gynodioecious wild strawberry. Ecology 85: 2550-2559.
  • Ashman, T. L.; King, E. A. 2005. Are flower-visiting ants mutualists or antagonists? A study in a gynodioecious wild strawberry. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 891-895.
  • Asker, S. 1977. Pseudogamy, hybridization and evolution in <em>Potentilla</em>. Hereditas 87: 179-183.
  • Aspinwall, N.; Christian, T. 1992. Pollination biology, seed production and population structure in queen-of-the-prarie <em>Filipendua rubra</em> Rosaceae at Botkin Fen Missouri. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 488-494.
  • Aspinwall, N.; Christian, T. 1992. Clonal structure, genotypic diversity and seed production in populations of <em>Filipendula rubra</em> Rosaceae from the northcentral United States. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 294-299.
  • Auclair, A. N. 1975. Sprouting response in <em>Prunus serotina</em> Erhr.: multivariate analysis of site, forest structure and growth rate relationships. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 94: 72-87.
  • Auclair, A. N.; Cottam, G. 1971. Dynamics of black cherry (<em>Prunus serotina</em> Erhr.) in southern Wisconsin oak forests. Ecol. Monogr. 41: 153-77.
  • Auclair, A. N.; Cottam, G. 1973. Multivariate analysis of radial growth of black cherry (<em>Prunus serotina</em> Erhr.) in southern Wisconsin oak forests. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 89: 408-25.
  • Avery, G. S.; Burkholder, P. R.; Creighton, H. B. 1937. Production and distribution of growth hormone in shoots of <em>Aesculus</em> and <em>Malus</em>, and its probable role in stimulating cambial activity. Amer. J. Bot. 24: 51-8.
  • Badizadegan, M. 1967. Physiological studies of dormancy and germination of apple (<em>Malus sylvestris</em> Mill.) seed. Ph.D. Thesis Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI104 p. (Diss. Abstr. 28(3):755B. 1967.)
  • Baiashvili, E. I. 1984. Towards a philo-genetic study of the genus <em>Prunus</em> Mill. Soobc. Akad. Nauk Gruzinsk. SSR 116(1): 137-9. (In German; English & Russian summaries)
  • Bailey, L. H. 1941. Species Batorum. The genus <em>Rubus</em> in North America (north of Mexico). Gentes Herb. 5: 1-932.
  • Bailey, L. H. 1949. <em>Rubus</em> studies - review and additions. Gentes Herb. 7: 479-526.
  • Bailey, L. H. 1947. Species studies in <em>Rubus</em>. Gentes Herb. 7: 193-349.
  • Bailey, L. H. 1949. The <em>Pyrus-Malus</em> puzzle. Gentes Herb. 8: 40-3.
  • Baillon, H. 1969. Monographie des Rosacees. Hist. Pl. 1: 345-483. (In French; English transl. M.M. Hartog, The natural history of plants. 1:335-471. 1871.)
  • Bakker, J. 1963. The historical development of <em>Prunus serotina</em> Ehrh. in the Netherlands. Ned. Boschbouw-Tijdschr. 35: 201-6.
  • Baldwin, J. T. 1946. <em>Spiraea latifolia</em> var. <em>septentrionalis</em> in Virginia. Rhodora 48: 112.
  • Baldwin, J. T. 1951. Chromosomes of <em>Spiraea</em> and of certain other genera of Rosaceae. Rhodora 53(632): 203-6.
  • Ballard, J. K.; Proebsting, E. L.; Tukey, R. B. 1971. Cherries: critical temperatures for blossom buds.
  • Baltzer, J. L.; Thomas, S. C. 2005. Leaf optical responses to light and soil nutrient availability in temperate deciduous trees. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 214-223.
  • Banasiak, S. E.; Meiners, S. J. 2009. Long term dynamics of <em>Rosa multiflora</em> in a successional system. Biological Invasions 11: 215-224.
  • Barbe, D. et.al. 1995. Allometry in the histogenesis of <em>Prunus</em> fruits (Rosaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 73(2): 299-306.
  • Bartgis, R. 1991. <em>Cypripedium candidum</em> and six other additions to the known flora of Maryland. Castanea 56: 220-1.
  • Baskin, J. M.; Baskin, C. C. 1985. Role of dispersal date and changes in physiological responses in controlling timing of germination in achenes of <em>Geum canadense</em>. Canad. J. Bot. 63: 1654-1658.
  • Bate-Smith, E. C. 1961. Chromatography and taxonomy in the Rosaceae, with special reference to <em>Potentilla</em> and <em>Prunus</em>. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 58: 39-54.
  • Beach, S. A. 1905. The apples of New York (2 vols.). Albany, NY. , 769 (2 vols.) pages.
  • Beadle, C. D. 1900. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em>- I. Bot. Gaz. 28: 405-17.
  • Bean, W. J. 1913. <em>Prunus pennsylvanica</em>. Bot. Mag. 139: pl. 8486.
  • Bean, W. J. 1913. <em>Pyrus ioensis</em>. Bot. Mag. 139: pl.8488.
  • Becker, H. F. 1963. The fossil record of the genus <em>Rosa</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 90: 99-110.
  • Belder, J. 1980. Nomenclatural difficulties of <em>Rosa virginiana</em>. Gartn.-Bot. Briefe 63: 32-3. (In German; English summary)
  • Bell, L. 1972. Rose signatures. Morris Arbor. Bull. 23: 59-66.
  • Bessey, C. E. 1902. Multiplication of species in botany. Science 15: 795.
  • Best, G. N. 1890. Remarks on the group Cinnamomeae of the North American roses. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 17: 142-9.
  • Bicknell, E. P. 1910. Have we enough New England blackberries? Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 37: 393-403.
  • Bishop, E. J. et.al. 2010. Sex-allocation plasticity in hermaphrodites of sexually dimorphic <em>Fragaria virginiana</em> (Rosaceae). Botany 88: 231-240.
  • Black, C. A. 1916. The nature of the inflorescence and fruit of <em>Pyrus malus</em>. Mem. New York Bot. Gard. 6: 519-47.
  • Blake, M. A. 1911. Factors which influence the blooming and ripening period of peaches. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 8: 95-101.
  • Blanchard, W. H. 1905. The yellow-fruited variety of the black raspberry. Rhodora 7: 143-6.
  • Blanchard, W. H. 1908. On the identity of <em>Rubus canadensis</em>. Rhodora 10: 117-21.
  • Blanchard, W. H. 1907. Connecticut Rubi. Rhodora 9: 4-10.
  • Blanchard, W. H. 1911. <em>Rubus</em> of eastern North America. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 38: 425-39.
  • Blanchard, W. H. 1909. Some points of nomenclature in <em>Trientalis</em> and <em>Rubus</em>. Rhodora 11: 236-7.
  • Bolle, F. 1933. An overview of the genus <em>Geum</em> L. and its sister genera. Feddes Repert. 72: 1-119. (In German)
  • Boman, J. S.; Casper, B. B. 1995. Differential postdispersal seed predation in disturbed and intact temperate forest. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 134: 107-116.
  • Bond, T. E. T. 1945. On sepal phyllody in roses and some related phenomena. Experimental data and a quantitative interpretation. New Phyt. 44: 220-30.
  • Bonne, G. 1928. Recherches sur le pedicelle et la fleur des Rosacees. Paris. , 380 pages.
  • Bortiri, E. et.al. 2001. Phylogeny and systematics of <em>Prunus</em> (Rosaceae) as determined by sequence analysis of ITS and the chloroplast TRNL-TRNF spacer DNA. Syst. Bot. 26: 797-807.
  • Bortiri, E. et.al. 2002. The phylogenetic utility of nucleotide sequences of sorbitol 6-phosphate dehydrogenase in <em>Prunus</em> (Rosaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1697-1708.
  • Bosy, J.; Aarssen, L. W. 1995. The effect of seed orientation on germination in a uniform environment: Differential success without genetic or environmental variation. J. Ecol. 83: 769-773.
  • Boulenger, G. A. 1937. Introduction a l'etude du genre <em>Rosa</em>. Les caracteres morphologiques passes en revue au point de vue de leur valeur pour la systematique. Bull. Jard. Bot. Etat 14: 241-73. (In French; see also revisions of certain sects. in vols. 9, 10, 12, 13, 14.)
  • Boutineau, E. 1883. De la fleur des Rosacees. Contribution a l'etude des ovaires inferes. Paris. , 44 pages.
  • Bouvier-Durand, M. et.al. 1984. Dormancy of apple embryos. Are starch and reserve protein changes related to dormancy breaking? Canad. J. Bot. 62: 2308-15.
  • Bowden, W. M. 1957. Cytotaxonomy of <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em>, allied species and cultivars. J. Arnold Arbor. 38: 381-388.
  • Bowersox, T. W.; Ward, W. W. 1977. Seasonal variation in foliar nutrient concentrations of black cherry. Forest Sci. 23: 429-36.
  • Boynton, K. R. 1931. <em>Rosa rugosa</em>. Addisonia 16: 91-2 [19-20], pl. 522.
  • Bradbury, D. 1929. A comparative study of the developing and aborting fruits of <em>Prunus cerasus</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 16: 525-41.
  • Bradford, F. C.; Bradford, R. H. 1949. Pollination of native crab apples of the northeastern United States. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 54: 133-6.
  • Brainerd, E. 1900. The blackberries of New England. Rhodora 2: 23-9.
  • Brand, M. 2009. <em>Aronia</em>: native shrubs with untapped potential. Arnoldia (Jamaica Plain) 67: 14-25.
  • Brase, K. D. 1937. The vascular anatomy of the flower of <em>Malus domestica</em>. M.S. Thesis Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY53 figs. + 23 p.
  • Brearley, C. 1987. The shrubby potentillas. The Plantsman 9: 90-109.
  • Bresowar, G. E.; Walker, G. L. 2011. Patterns of genetic distribution of <em>Sibbaldiopsis tridentata</em> (Rosaceae) in the eastern United States. Castanea 76: 210-221.
  • Britton, D. M.; Hull, J. W. 1956. Mitotic instability in <em>Rubus</em>. J. Heredity 47: 205-10.
  • Britton, D. M.; Hull, J. W. 1957. Chromosome numbers of <em>Rubus</em>. Fruit Var. Hort. Digest 11: 58-60.
  • Britton, Nathaniel L. 1918. <em>Aronia atropurpurea</em>. Addisonia 3: 1-2.
  • Britton, Nathaniel L. 1918. <em>Aronia arbutifolia</em>. Addisonia 3: 33.
  • Brizicky, George K. 1968. <em>Sorbus</em> and the problem of generic typification. J. Arnold Arbor. 49: 502-8.
  • Browicz, K. 1993. Conspect and chorology of the genus <em>Pyrus</em>. Arbor. Kornickie 38: 17-33.
  • Brown, H. B. 1910. The genus <em>Crateagus</em>, with some theories concerning the origin of its species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 37: 251-60.
  • Brown, R. T. 1967. Influence of naturally occurring compounds on germination and growth of jack pine. Ecology 48: 542-6. (Also discussions on Cornus, Gaultheria, & Prunus)
  • Bruneau, A. et.al. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus <em>Rosa</em>: new evidence from chloroplast DNA sequences and an appraisal of current knowledge. Syst. Bot. 32: 366-378.
  • Buchanan, R. E. 1904. A contribution to our knowledge of <em>Prunus americana</em>. Proc. Iowa Acad. Sci. 11: 77-93.
  • Burbeck, J. H. 1975. Wild roses of the northeast. Amer. Rose 23(1): 17.
  • Burnham, S. H. 1901. Field days of the Torrey Botanical Club. Torreya 1: 119-20.
  • Bush, A. 1971. Utilization of the culinary and therapeutic properties of the peach. Econ. Bot. 25(1): 12-21.
  • Bush, B. F. 1912. The geographic origin of <em>Crataegus viridis</em> L. Rhodora 14: 81-6.
  • Buton, P. J.; Bazzaz, F. A. 1995. Ecophysiological responses of tree seedlings invading different patches of old-field vegetation. J. Ecol. 83: 99-112.
  • Cafferty, S.; Jarvis, C. E. 2002. Typification of Linnaean plant names in Rosaceae. Taxon 51: 539-545.
  • Camp, W. H. 1942. The <em>Crataegus</em> problem. Castanea 7(4-5): 51-5.
  • Camp, W. H. 1942. Ecological problems and species concepts in <em>Crataegus</em>. Ecology 23: 368-9.
  • Campbell, C. S. et.al. 1997. Morphological variation in sexual and agamospermous <em>Amelanchier</em> (Rosaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 75: 1166-73.
  • Campbell, C. S. et.al. 2007. Phylogeny of subtribe Pyrinae (formerly the Maloideae, Rosaceae): limited resolution of a complex evolutionary history. Pl. Syst. Evol. 266: 119-145.
  • Campbell, C. S.; Alice, L. A.; Wright, W. A. 1999. Comparisons of within-population genetic variation in sexual and agamospermous <em>Amelanchier</em> (Rosaceae) using RAPD markers. Pl. Syst. Evol. 215: 157-167.
  • Campbell, C. S.; Dickinson, T. A. 1990. Apomixis, patterns of morphological variation and species concepts in subfam. Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 15(1): 124-35.
  • Campbell, C. S.; Donoghue, M. J.; Baldwin, B. G.; Wojciechowski, M. F. 1995. Phylogenetic relationships in Maloideae (Rosaceae): evidence from sequences of the internal transcribed spacers of nuclear ribosomal DNA and its congruence with morphology. Amer. J. Bot. 82(7): 903-18.
  • Campbell, C. S.; Greene, C. W.; Bergquist, S. E. 1987. Apomixis and sexuality in three species of <em>Amelanchier</em>, shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloideae). Amer. J. Bot. 74: 321-8.
  • Campbell, C. S.; Greene, C. W.; Dickinson, T. A. 1991. Reproductive biology in subfam. Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 16(2): 333-49.
  • Campbell, C. S.; Greene, C. W.; Neubauer, B. F.; Higgins, J. M. 1985. Apomixis in <em>Amelanchier laevis</em>, shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloideae). Amer. J. Bot. 72: 1397-403.
  • Campbell, C. S.; Wright, W. A. 1996. Agamospermy, hybridization, and taxonomic complexity in <em>Amelanchier</em> (Rosaceae). Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 31: 345-54.
  • Canham, C. D.; McAninch, J. B.; Wood, D. M. 1994. Effects of the frequency, timing, and intensity of simulated browsing on growth and mortality of tree seedlings. Canad. J. Forest Res. 24: 817-25.
  • Card, F. W. 1911. Bush-fruits: A horticultural monograph of raspberries, blackberries, dewberries, currants, gooseberries, and other shrub-like fruits. ed. New York. , 537 pages. (The first volume in the Rural Science Series, ed. by L.H. Bailey.)
  • Carter, K. K. 1980. Geographic variation in black cherry (<em>Prunus serotina</em> Ehrh.). Ph.D. Dissertation West Virginia Univ., Morgantown, WV,
  • Carter, K. K. 1996. Provenance tests as indicators of growth response to climate change in 10 north temperate tree species. Canad. J. Forest Res. 26: 1089-95. (French summary)
  • Carter, K. K.; Cech, F. C.; DeHayes, D. H. 1983. Geographical variation in <em>Prunus serotina</em>. Canad. J. Forest Res. 13: 1025-1029.
  • Challice, J. S. 1974. Rosaceae chemotaxonomy and the origins of Pomoideae. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 69(4): 239-59.
  • Challice, J. S. 1981. Chemotaxonomic studies in the family Rosaceae and the evolutionary origins of the subfamily Maloideae. Preslia 53(4): 289-304. (Chech summary)
  • Challice, J. S.; Westwood, M. N. 1973. Numerical taxonomic studies of the genus <em>Pyrus</em> using both chemical and botanical characters. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 67: 121-48.
  • Challice, J. S.; Williams, A. H. 1968. Phenolic compounds of the genus <em>Pyrus</em> II. A chemotaxonomic survey. Phytochemistry 7: 1781-801.
  • Chaney, W. R.; Kozlowski, T. T. 1969. Seasonal and diurnal expansion and contraction of fruits of forest trees. Canad. J. Bot. 47: 1033-8.
  • Chapman, R. R.; Crow, G. E. 1981. Raunkiaer's Life Form classification in relation to fire. Bartonia 48: 19-33.
  • Christen, D. C.; Matlack, G. R. 2009. The habitat and conduit functions of roads in the spread of three invasive plant species. Biological Invasions 11: 453-465. (Microstegium vimenium, Rosa multiflora, Tussilago farfara)
  • Christensen, K. I. 1982. A biometric study of some hybridising <em>Crataegus</em> populations in Denmark. Nordic J. Bot. 2: 537-48.
  • Chute, H. M. 1930. The morphology and anatomy of the achene. Amer. J. Bot. 17: 703-23.
  • Cinq-Mars, L. 1971. Le genre <em>Amelanchier</em> au Quebec. Naturaliste Canad. 98: 329-45.
  • Clarkson, R. 1959. The West Virginia <em>Spiraea</em>. Castanea 24: 143-6.
  • Clausen, J.; Keck, D. D.; Hiesey, W. M. 1945. Experimental studies on the nature of species. II. Plant evolution through amphiploidy and autoploidy, with examples from the Madiinae. Publ. Carnegie Inst. Wash. 564: 1-174. (Amphiploids in the genus Rubus, 104-116.)
  • Cockerell, T. D. A. 1929. The evolution and classification of roses. Torreya 29: 97-103.
  • Coladoanto, M. 1993. <em>Rubus chamaemorus</em>. ()
  • Coladoanto, M. 1994. <em>Rubus canadensis</em>. ()
  • Collins, S. L. 1990. Habitat relationships and survivorship of tree seedlings in hemlock-hardwood forest. Canad. J. Bot. 68: 790-7. (French summary)
  • Cook, D. B.; Hamilton, W. J. 1944. The ecological relationships of red fox food in eastern New York. Ecology 25(1): 91-104.
  • Corbet, S. A. 1979. Humidity, nectar and insect visits to flowers, with special reference to <em>Crataegus</em>, <em>Tilia</em>, and <em>Echium</em>. Ecol. Entomol. 4: 9-22.
  • CotÚ, J. F.; Thibault, J. R. 1988. Allelopathic potential of raspberry (<em>Rubus idaes</em>) foliar leachates on growth of ectomycorrhizal fungi associated with black spruce (<em>Picea mariana</em>). Amer. J. Bot. 75(7): 966-70.
  • Courtney, S. P.; Manzur, M. I. 1985. Fruiting and fitness in <em>Crataegus monogyna</em>: The effects of frugivores and seed predators. Oikos 44: 398-406.
  • Craig, D. L. 1960. Studies on the cytology and the breeding behavior of <em>Rubus canadensis</em> L. Canad. J. Genet. Cytol. 2: 96-102.
  • Crane, M. B. 1940. Reproductive versatility in <em>Rubus</em>. I. Morphology and inheritance. J. Genet. 40: 109-18.
  • Crane, M. B.; Darlington, C. D. 1927. The origin of new forms in <em>Rubus</em>, I. Genetica 9: 241-78.
  • Crane, M. B.; Thomas, P. T. 1949. Reproductive versatility in <em>Rubus</em>. III. Raspberry-blackberry hybrids. Heredity 3: 99-107.
  • Crawford, E. R.; Young, D. R. 1998. Comparison of gaps and intact shrub thickets on an Atlantic coast barrier island. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 140: 68-77.
  • Crepin, F. 1889. Sketch of a new classification of roses. J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 11: 217-28.
  • Crepin, F. 1896. Rosae americanae I. Observation upon the genus <em>Rosa</em> in North America. Bot. Gaz. 22: 1-34.
  • Crepin, F. 1869. Primitia monographiae rosarum. Materiaux pour servir a l'histoire des roses. 856 pp. Gand [Ghent], Belgium. 1869-1882.
  • Crepin, F. 1887. Nouvelles remarques sur les roses americaines. Bull. Soc. Roy. Bot. Belgique 26: 40-9. (See also Ibid. 28(2):18-33. 1889.)
  • Crocker, W.; Barton, L. V. 1931. After-ripening, germination, and storage of certain rosaceous seeds. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 3: 385-404.
  • Culley, T. M. et.al. 2011. The role of horticulture in plant invasions: how grafting in cultivars of Callery pear (<em>Pyrus calleryana</em>) can facilitate spread into natural areas. Biological Invasions 13: 739-746.
  • Culley, T. M.; Hardiman, N. A. 2007. The beginning of a new invasive plant: a history of the ornamental Callery pear in the United States. Bioscience 57: 956-964.
  • Culley, T. M.; Hardiman, N. A. 2009. The role of intraspecific hybridization in the evolution of invasiveness: a case study of the ornamental pear tree <em>Pyrus calleryana</em>. Biological Invasions 11: 1107-1119.
  • Cummings, M. B.; Jenkins, E. W.; Dunning, R. G. 1936. Sterility in pears.
  • Cypher, B. L.; Cypher, E. A. 1999. Germination rates of tree seeds ingested by coyotes and raccoons. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 142: 71-76.
  • Czapik, R. 1996. Problems of apomictic reproduction in the families Compositae and Rosaceae. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 31: 381-7.
  • Dandy, J. E. 1969. Nomina conservanda proposita (272) 3338 pars. <em>Aronia</em> Medikus. Taxon 18: 467.
  • Darlington, C. D. 1928. Studies in <em>Prunus</em>, I and II. J. Genet. 19: 213-56.
  • Darrow, G. M. 1920. Are our raspberries derived from American or European species? J. Heredity 11: 178-84.
  • Davidson, C. G. 1986. Experimental taxonomy, propagation and models of inheritance for flower color and extra petals in <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em> L. Ph.D. Dissertation Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg,
  • Davidson, C. G.; Lenz, L. M. 1989. Experimental taxonomy of <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em>. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 3520-3528. (French summary)
  • Davis, D. D.; Umbach, D. M.; Coppolino, J. B. 1981. Susceptibility of tree and shrub species and response of black cherry foliage to ozone. Pl. Dis. Reporter 65: 904-7.
  • Davis, H. A. 1990. Studies in <em>Rubus</em>. Castanea 55: 22-30.
  • Davis, H. A.; Fuller, A. M.; Davis, T. 1969. Contributions toward the revision of the Eubati of eastern North America. V, Arguti. Castanea 34: 235-66.
  • Davis, H. A.; Fuller, A. M.; Davis, T. 1970. Contributions toward the revision of the Eubati of eastern North America. VI, Cuneifolii. Castanea 35: 176-94.
  • Davis, H. A.; Fuller, A. M.; Davis, T. 1968. Contributions toward the revision of the Eubati of eastern North America. III, Flagellares. Castanea 33: 206-41.
  • Davis, H. A.; Fuller, A. M.; Davis, T. 1967. Contributions toward the revision of the Eubati of eastern North America. Castanea 32: 20-37.
  • Davis, H. A.; Fuller, A. M.; Davis, T. 1968. Contributions toward the revision of the Eubati of eastern North America. II, Setosi. Castanea 33: 50-76.
  • Davis, H. A.; Fuller, A. M.; Davis, T. 1969. Contributions toward the revision of the Eubati of eastern North America. IV. Verotriviales, Canadenses, Alleghanienses. Castanea 34: 157-79.
  • Davis, S. G. 1942. Composition and utilization of the beach plum. Fruit Products J. 21: 361-364.
  • Davis, W. E.; Rose, R. C. 1912. The effect of external conditions upon the after-ripening of the seeds of <em>Crataegus mollis</em>. Bot. Gaz. 54: 49-62.
  • Davis, W. H. 1958. Apomixis, hybridization, and speciation in <em>Rubus</em>. Castanea 23: 52-5.
  • Davis, W. T. 1904. The ripening of the fruit of chokeberries. Proc. Nat. Sci. Assoc. Staten Island 9: 32.
  • De Vos, F. 1960. The cultivated Pyracanthas. Gard. J. New York Bot. Gard. 10: 215-7.
  • Decainse, M. J. 1874. Memoire sur la famille des Pomacees. Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris 10: 113-92.
  • Decaisne, M. J. 1874. Memoires sur la famille des Pomacees. Nouv. Arch. Mus. Hist. Nat. Paris 10: 113-92.
  • Decker, S. R. et.al. 1991. Nutritional evaluation of winter foods of wild turkeys. Canad. J. Zoology 69: 2128-2132.
  • Defler, S. E. 1937. Black cherry; characteristics, germination, growth and yield. M.S. Thesis New York State Coll. Forestry, Syracuse, NY129 p.
  • Degrandi-Hoffman, G.; Hoopingarner, R.; Baker, K. K. 1985. The influence of honey bees "sideworking" behavior on cross-pollination and fruit-set in apples. Hortscience 20: 397-9.
  • Delucia, E. H.; Sipe, T. W.; Herrick, J.; Maherali, H. 1998. Sapling biomass allocation and growth in the understory of a deciduous hardwood forest. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 955-963.
  • Dibble, A. C. 1995. Conservation biology of shadbush, <em>Amelanchier</em> (Rosaceae): evidence from systematics, population structure and reproductive ecology. Ph.D. Dissertation University of Maine, Orono, ME,
  • Dibble, A. C.; Campbell, C. S. 1995. Distribution and conservation of Nantucket shadbush, <em>Amelanchier nantucketensis</em> (Rosaceae). Rhodora 97: 339-49.
  • Dibble, A. C.; Campbell, C. S.; Wright, W. A. 1991. Reproductive biology of the narrow endemic <em>Amelanchier nantucketensis</em> (Rosaceae:Maloideae). Amer. J. Bot. 78(6)(Suppl.): 179. (Abstract)
  • Dibble, A. C.; Drummond, F. A. 1997. Floral syndrome in <em>Amelanchier nantucketensis</em> (Rosaceae). I. Floral density, bee activity, and characterization of andropetaly. Canad. J. Bot. 75: 1851-9.
  • Dibble, A. C.; Drummond, F. A.; Laberge, W. E. 1997. Floral syndrome in <em>Amelanchier nantucketensis</em> (Rosaceae). II. Bee preference and diversity associated with andropetaly. Canad. J. Bot. 75: 1860-7.
  • Dibble, A. C.; Wright, W. A.; Campbell, C. S. 1998. Quantitative morphology of the <em>Amelanchier</em> agamic complex (Rosaceae) at a Maine site. Syst. Bot. 23: 31-41.
  • Dibello, F. J.; Arthur, S. M.; Krohn, W. B. 1990. Food habits of sympatric coyotes, red foxes, and bobcats in Maine. Canad. Field-Naturalist 104: 403-8.
  • Dickinson, T. A. 1986. Topodeme differentiation in Ontario taxa of <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae:Maloideae): leaf morphometric evidence. Canad. J. Bot. 64: 2738-47.
  • Dickinson, T. A. 1983. <em>Crataegus crus-galli</em> L. sensu lato in southern Ontario: phenotypic variation and variability in relation to reproductive behavior. Ph.D. Dissertation Univ. Western Ontario, London, Ontario,
  • Dickinson, T. A. 1985. The biology of Canadian weeds. 68. <em>Crataegus crus-galli</em> L. sensu lato. Canad. J. Pl. Sci. 65: 641-54.
  • Dickinson, T. A. 1995. The biology of Canadian weeds. 68. <em>Crataegus crus-galli</em> L. sensu lato. In: The Biology of Canadian Weeds. The Agricultural Institute of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. , 76-89 pages.
  • Dickinson, T. A. et.al. 2007. Polyploidy, reproductive biology, and Rosaceae: understanding evolution and making classifications. Pl. Syst. Evol. 266: 59-78.
  • Dickinson, T. A.; Belaoussoff, S.; Love, R. M.; Muniyamma, M. 1996. North American black-fruited hawthorns: 1. Variation in floral construction, breeding system correlates, and their possible evolutionary significance in <em>Crataegus</em> sect. <em>Douglasii</em> Loudon. Folia Geobot. Phytotax. 31: 355-71.
  • Dickinson, T. A.; Campbell, C. S. 1991. Evolution in the Maloideae (Rosaceae): introduction. Syst. Bot. 16(2): 299-302.
  • Dickinson, T. A.; Campbell, C. S. 1991. Population structure and reproductive ecology in the Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 16(2): 350-62.
  • Dickinson, T. A.; Phipps, J. B. 1986. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae: Maloideae) XIV. The breeding system of <em>Crataegus crus-galli sensu lato</em> in Ontario. Amer. J. Bot. 73: 116-30.
  • Dickinson, T. A.; Phipps, J. B. 1985. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em> L. (Rosaceae:Maloideae): XIII. Degree and pattern of phenotypic variation in <em>Crataegus</em> sect. <em>Crus-galli</em> in Ontario. Syst. Bot. 10(3): 322-37.
  • Dickinson, T. A.; Phipps, J. B. 1984. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae: Maloideae). IX. Short-shoot leaf heteroblasty in <em>Crataegus crus-galli sensu lato</em>. Canad. J. Bot. 62: 1775-80.
  • Dickinson, T. A.; Phipps, J. B. 1980. Correlated experimental and developmental studies of reproductive behavior in <em>Crataegus crus-galli</em> L. sensu lato. (Abstract)
  • Dickson, E. E. 1995. Systematic studies of <em>Malus</em> section <em>Chloromeles</em> (Maloideae, Rosaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY323 p.
  • Dickson, E. E.; Kresovich, S.; Weeden, N. F. 1991. Isozymes in North American <em>Malus</em> (Rosaceae): hybridization and species differentiation. Syst. Bot. 16(2): 363-75.
  • Dirr, M. A. 1978. Tolerance of seven woody ornamentals to soil-applied sodium chloride. J. Arboric. 4(7): 162-5.
  • Dorsey, M. J. 1930. The relation between embryo-sac development and the set of fruit in apple. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 26: 56-61.
  • Dorsey, M. J.; Weiss, F. 1920. Petiolar glands in the plum. Bot. Gaz. 69: 391-406.
  • Downey, S. L.; Iezzoni, A. F. 2000. Polymorphic DNA markers in black cherry (<em>Prunus serotina</em>) are identified using sequences from sweet cherry, peach, and sour cherry. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 125: 76-80.
  • Downs, A. A. 1952. Preliminary recommendations for the management of black cherry on the northern Allegheny Plateau. J. Forest. 51: 184-8.
  • Dowrick, G. J. 1966. Breeding systems in tetraploid <em>Rubus</em> species. Genet. Res. 7: 245-53.
  • Dowrick, G. J. 1961. Biology of reproduction in <em>Rubus</em>. Nature 191: 680-2.
  • Drew, A. P. 1988. Interference of black cherry by ground flora of the Allegheny uplands. Canad. J. Forest Res. 18(5): 652-7.
  • Drummond, B. A. 2005. The selection of native and invasive plants by frugivorous birds in Maine. Northeastern Naturalist 12: 33-44.
  • Eaton, G. W. 1959. A study of the megagametophyte in <em>Prunus avium</em> and its relation to fruit setting. Canad. J. Pl. Sci. 39
  • Eaton, G. W. 1959. Twin ovules in <em>Prunus avium</em> L. Canad. J. Bot. 37: 1203-5.
  • Eckardt, N. 1987. Element stewardship abstract for <em>Rosa multiflora</em> - rambler rose.
  • Eggleston, W. W. 1906. <em>Crataegus</em> of Dutchess County, New York. Torreya 6: 63-7. (Also Bergen, Nassau, Putnam, & Westchester Cos.)
  • Eggleston, W. W. 1908. The <em>Crataegi</em> of the northeastern United States and adjacent Canada. Rhodora 10: 73-84.
  • Eggleston, W. W. 1908. The thorn trees, genus <em>Crataegus</em> L. In: North American Trees. Holt, New York. , 443-82 pages.
  • Egolf, D. R.; Dreschsler, R. F. 1967. Chromosome numbers of <em>Pyracantha</em> [Rosaceae]. Baileya 15: 82-8.
  • Einset, J. 1947. Chromosome studies in <em>Rubus</em>. Gentes Herb. 7: 181-92.
  • Einset, J. 1951. Apomixis in American polyploid blackberries. Amer. J. Bot. 38: 768-72.
  • El-Gazzar, A. 1981. Chromosome numbers and rust susceptibility as taxonomic criteria in Rosaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 137: 23-38.
  • El-Gazzar, A. 1980. The taxonomic significance of leaf morphology in <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 101: 457-69.
  • El-Gazzar, A.; Badawi, A. A. 1977. The taxonomic significance of chromosome numbers and geography in <em>Crataegus</em> L. Phytologia 35(4): 271-5.
  • Elkington, T. T. 1969. Cytotaxonomic variation in <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em> L. New Phyt. 68: 151-160.
  • Elkington, T. T.; Woodel, S. R. J. 1963. <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em> L. J. Ecol. 53: 769-781.
  • Elkington, T. T.; Woodell, S. R. J. 1963. Biological flora of the British Isles: <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em> L. J. Ecol. 51: 769-781.
  • Eriksson, T. et.al. 2003. The phylogeny of Rosoideae (Rosaceae) based on sequences of the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the TRNL/F region of chloroplast DNA. Int. J. Plant Sci. 164: 197-211.
  • Eriksson, T.; Donoghue, M. J.; Hibbs, M. S. 1998. Phylogenetic analysis of <em>Potentilla</em> using DNA sequences of nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (ITS), and implications for the classification of Rosoideae (Rosaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 211: 155-179.
  • Erlanson, E. W. 1929. Cytological conditions and evidences for hybridity in North American wild roses. Bot. Gaz. 87: 443-506.
  • Erlanson, E. W. 1931. Sterility in wild roses and in some species hybrids. Genetics 16: 75-96.
  • Erlanson, E. W. 1938. Phylogeny and polyploidy in <em>Rosa</em>. New Phyt. 37: 72-81.
  • Erlanson, E. W. 1934. Experimental data for a revision of the North American wild roses. Bot. Gaz. 96: 197-259.
  • Erlanson, E. W. 1929. The phenological procession in North American wild roses in relation to the polyploid series. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci. 11: 137-50.
  • Erlanson, E. W. 1928. Ten new American species and varieties of <em>Rosa</em>. Rhodora 30: 109-21.
  • Ertter, Barbara 2008. Nomenclatural notes in North American <em>Potentilla</em> (Rosaceae). J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 2: 201-205.
  • Eseltine, G. P. van 1933. Notes on the species of apples. 2. The Japanese flowering crabapples of the <em>Sieboldii</em> group and their hybrids.
  • Eseltine, G. P. van 1933. Notes on the species of apples. 1. The American crabapples.
  • Evans, J. E. 1983. A literature review of management practices for multiflora rose (<em>Rosa multiflora</em>). Natural Areas Journal 3: 6-15.
  • Evans, R. C.; Campbell, C. S. 2002. The origin of the apple subfamily (Maloideae: Rosaceae) is clarified by DNA sequence data from duplicated GBSSI genes. Amer. J. Bot. 89: 1478-1484.
  • Evans, R. C.; Dickinson, T. A. 2005. Floral ontogeny and morphology in <em>Gillenia</em> ("Spiraeoideae'') and subfamily Maloideae C. Weber (Rosaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 166: 427-447.
  • Evans, R. C.; Dickinson, T. A. 1999. Floral ontogeny and morphology in subfamily Spiraeoideae Endl. (Rosaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 160: 981-1012.
  • Evans, R. C.; Dickinson, T. A. 1999. Floral ontogeny and morphology in subfamily Amygdaloideae T. & G. (Rosaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 160: 955-979.
  • Fagerlind, F. 1958. Hip and seed formation in newly formed <em>Rosa</em> polyploids. Acta Horti Berg. 17: 229-56.
  • Fagerlind, F. 1951. Influence of the pollen-giver on the production of hips, achenes and seeds in the "Canina roses". Acta Horti Berg. 16: 121-68.
  • Farmer, R. E.; Barnett, P. E. 1972. Altitudinal variation in seed characteristics of black cherry in the southern Appalachians. Forest Sci. 18(2): 169-75.
  • Fassett, N. C. 1941. Mass collections: <em>Rubus odoratus</em> and <em>R. parviflorus</em>. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 28: 299-374.
  • Faust, M; Suranyi, D 1999. Origin and dissemination of plums. Horticultural Reviews 23: 179-231.
  • Fell, K. R.; Rowson, J. M. 1956. Anatomical studies in the genus <em>Rubus</em>. I. The anatomy of the leaf of <em>Rubus idaeus</em> L. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 8: 334-345.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1923. The identities of the sand cherries of eastern America. Rhodora 25(293): 69-74.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1900. <em>Rubus idaeus</em> and its variety <em>anomalus</em> in America. Rhodora 2: 195-200.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1946. <em>Amelanchier spicata</em> not an American species. Rhodora 48(570): 125-9.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1947. Minor transfers in <em>Pyrus</em>. Rhodora 49(585): 229-33.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1948. Some minor forms of <em>Rosa</em>. Rhodora 50(594): 145-7.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1916. <em>Prunus virginiana</em> the correct name of the choke cherry. Rhodora 18(210): 140-1.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1918. <em>Rosa blanda</em> and its allies of northern Maine and adjacent Canada. Rhodora 20(233): 90-6.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1912. The inland variety of <em>Spiraea tomentosa</em>. Rhodora 14: 188-90.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1949. Contributions from the Gray Herbarium of Harvard University. No. CLXIX. Part II. Studies of eastern American plants. 2. Blackberries, old and new. Rhodora 51(603): 43-51.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1919. <em>Rubus idaeus</em> and some of its variations in North America. Rhodora 21(245): 89-98.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1941. Another century of additions to the flora of Virginia. Rhodora 43: 559-630, 635-657.
  • Fernald, M. L. 1948. A small gathering of blackberries. Rhodora 50(592): 73-80.
  • Ferree, D. C. (eds.) (2003): 2003. Apples: botany, production and uses. CABI. , 672 pages. (ISBN 0851995926)
  • Fiala, J. 1995. Flowering crabapples. The genus <em>Malus</em>. Timber Press, Portland, OR. , 340 pages.
  • Fireman, M.; Hayward, H. E. 1952. Effect of night temperature on growth of the fruit of the sour cherry. Bot. Gaz. 114(1): 155-65.
  • Flemion, F. 1938. Breaking the dormancy of seeds of <em>Crataegus</em> species. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 9: 409-23.
  • Flemion, F. 1931. After-ripening, germination, and vitality of seeds of <em>Sorbus aucuparia</em> L. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 3: 413-39.
  • Fletcher, W. F. 1946. American species of <em>Amelanchier</em>. Ill. Biol. Monographs. Vol. 20, No. 2. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana.
  • Flogner, V. 1897. Beitroge zur Systematik und pflanzengeographischen Verbreitung der Pomaceen. Oesterr. Bot. Z. 47: 117-25, 153-78, 199-206, 296-300.
  • Flory, W. S. 1950. Pollen condition in some species and hybrids of <em>Rosa</em> with a consideration of associated phylogenetic factors. Virginia J. Sci. 1: 11-59.
  • Focke, W. O. 1881. Uber die naturliche Gliederung und die geographische Verbreitung der Gattung <em>Rubus</em>. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 1: 87-103. (In German)
  • Focke, W. O. 1910. Species Ruborum. Monographie generis <em>Rubi</em> prodromus. Biblioth. Bot. 72:1-223; 83:1-274
  • Fosberg, F. R. 1941. Observations on Virginia plants, part I. Virginia J. Sci. 2: 106-11.
  • Fox, W. S.; Soper, J. H. 1953. The distribution of some trees and shrubs of the Carolinian Zone of southern Ontario. II. Trans. Roy. Canad. Inst. 30: 3-32.
  • Free, J. B. 1970. Insect pollination of crops. Academic Press, New York. , 544 pages.
  • Freeman, C. C. et.al. 1998. Vascular plants new to Kansas. Sida 18: 593-604.
  • Frye, C. T. 2006. Morphometric analysis of an <em>Amelanchier</em> (Rosaceae: Maloideae) complex on the Delmarva Peninsula (Delaware, Maryland and eastern Virginia) resolves the taxonomic identities of <em>Amelanchier obovalis</em> and <em>A. canadensis</em>. Sida 22: 1027-1048.
  • Fryer, J.; Hylmo, B. 2009. Cotoneasters. Timber Press, Portland, OR. , 344 pages. (ISBN 9780881929270)
  • Fulford, R. M. 1966. The morphogenesis of apple buds. IV. The effect of fruit. Ann. Bot. 30: 596-606.
  • Fulford, R. M. 1966. The morphogenesis of apple buds. III. The inception of flowers. Ann. Bot. 30: 207-19.
  • Fulford, R. M. 1966. The morphogenesis of apple buds. II. The development of the bud. Ann. Bot. 30: 25-38.
  • Fulford, R. M. 1965. The morphogenesis of apple buds. I. The activity of the apical meristem. Ann. Bot. 29: 167-80.
  • Gajewski, W. 1957. A cytological study on the genus <em>Geum</em>. Monogr. Bot. 4: 1-414.
  • Gajewski, W. 1958. Evolution in the genus <em>Geum</em>. Evolution 13: 378-388.
  • Gandhi, K. N. et.al. 2009. (1886-1887) Proposals to conserve the names <em>Prunus serotina</em> and <em>P. virginiana</em> (Rosaceae) with conserved types. Taxon 58: 312-314.
  • Gannavarapu, M 1998. Microsatellite markers in peach [<em>Prunus persica</em> (L.) Batsch]: abundance and utility. M.S. Thesis Clemson Univ., Clemson, S.C.,
  • Gendel's, T. V. 1990. Morphological leaf transformation in the genus <em>Sorbus</em> (Rosaceae). Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Lenengrad) 75(1): 57-61. (In Russian)
  • George, M. F.; Hong, S. G.; Burke, M. J. 1977. Cold hardiness and deep supercooling of hardwoods: its occurrence in provenance collections of red oak, yellow birch, black walnut, and black cherry. Ecology 58: 674-80.
  • Gille, A. 1949. Le <em>Spiraea tomentosa</em> L. dans la region de Granby (comte de Shefford, Quebec, Canada): etude ecologique et phytosociologique. Vegetatio 2: 166-96. (In French; English summary)
  • Ginsberg, H. S. 1983. Foraging ecology of bees in an old field. Ecology 64: 165-175.
  • Gleason, H. A. 1945. A botanist looks at a rose. J. New York Bot. Gard. 46: 215-20.
  • Glenn, Steven D. 1997. <em>Bombus</em> sp. visiting flowers of <em>Spiraea latifolia</em>.
  • Good, N. F.; Good, R. E. 1972. Population dynamics of tree seedlings and saplings in a mature eastern hardwood forest. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 99: 172-8.
  • Gorchov, D. L. 1988. Effects of pollen and resources on seed number and other fitness components in <em>Amelanchier arborea</em> (Rosaceae: Maloideae). Amer. J. Bot. 75(9): 1275-85.
  • Gorchov, D. L. 1985. Fruit ripening asynchrony is related to variable seed number in <em>Amelanchier</em> and <em>Vaccinium</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 72: 1939-43.
  • Gorchov, D. L. 1988. Does asynchronous fruit ripening avoid satiation of seed dispersers?: a field test. Ecology 69: 1545-51.
  • Gorchov, D. L.; Estabrook, G. F. 1987. A test of several hypotheses for the determination of seed number in <em>Amelanchier arborea</em>, using simulated probability distributions to evaluate data. Amer. J. Bot. 74: 1893-7.
  • Gosler, A. G.; Kelly, C. K.; Blakey, J. K. 1994. Phenotypic plasticity in leaf morphology of <em>Crataegus monogyna</em> (Rosaceae): an experimental study with taxonomic implications. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 115(3): 211-9.
  • Goswami, D. A.; Matfield, B. 1974. Pseudogamy in the genus <em>Potentilla</em>. New Phyt. 73: 1243-7.
  • Gottschalk, K. W. 1985. Effects of shading on growth and development of northern red oak, black oak, black cherry, and red maple seedlings. I. Height, diameter, and root/shoot ratio. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Central Hardwoods Conference. Society of American Foresters, Urbana, IL. , 189-95 pages.
  • Gottschalk, K. W. 1994. Shade, leaf growth and crown development of <em>Quercus rubra</em>, <em>Quercus velutina</em>, <em>Prunus serotina</em>, and <em>Acer rubrum</em> seedlings. Tree Physiology 14: 735-749.
  • Gracza, P. 1970. Some observations on pistil organization of <em>Pyrus communis</em> L. Bot. Kozlem. 57: 175-82. (In Hungarian; English summary)
  • Greene, E. L. 1892. On certain Spiraeaceae. Pittonia 2: 219-22.
  • Greene, E. L. 1889. The North American <em>Neilliae</em>. Pittonia 2: 25-31. (Includes Physocarpus)
  • Greller, A. M. et.al. 2006. Habitat observations of <em>Geum vernum</em> in Kings Point Park, Long Island, and a discussion of the species' potential invasiveness in New York State. Urban Habitats 4: 9 pp..
  • Grewal, M. S. 1970. Cytotaxonomy of <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em> L. Ph.D. Thesis University College London,
  • Grewal, M. S.; Ellis, J. R. 1972. Sex determination in <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em>. Heredity 29: 359-362.
  • Groh, H.; Senn, H. A. 1940. <em>Prunus</em> in eastern Canada. Canad. J. Res., Sect. C, Bot. Sci. 18: 318-46.
  • Grossi, C.; Raymond, O.; Jay, M. 1998. Flavonoid and enzyme polymorphisms and taxonomic organisation of <em>Rosa</em> sections: <em>Carolinae, Cinnamomeae, Pimpinellifoliae</em> and <em>Synstylae</em>. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 26: 857-871.
  • Guinier, E. 1902. Le cerisier de Virginie (<em>Prunus virginiana</em> L., <em>Cerasus virginiana</em> DC.) et le cerisier tardif (<em>Prunus serotina</em> Ehrh., <em>Cerasus serotina</em> DC.). Bull. Soc. Bot. France 49: 20-3. (In French)
  • Guitian, J. 1994. Selective fruit abortion in <em>Prunus mahaleb</em> (Rosaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 81(12): 1555-8.
  • Guitian, J. 1993. Why <em>Prunus mahaleb</em> (Rosaceae) produces more flowers than fruits. Amer. J. Bot. 80(11): 1305-9.
  • Guitian, J.; Guitian, P.; Sanchez, J. M. 1993. Reproductive biology of two <em>Prunus</em> species (Rosaceae) in the northwest Iberian Peninsula. Pl. Syst. Evol. 185: 153-65. (P. mahaleb)
  • Guo, W. et.al. 2011. A phylogeny of <em>Photinia</em> sensu lato (Rosaceae) and related genera based on nrITS and cpDNA analysis. Pl. Syst. Evol. 291: 91-102.
  • Gustafsson, Å. 1944. The constitution of the <em>Rosa canina</em> complex. Hereditas 30: 405-28.
  • Habeck, R. J. 1991. <em>Spiraea betulifolia</em>. ()
  • Hall, I. V.; Gourley, C. O.; Wood, G. W. 1981. Biology of <em>Prunus pensylvanica</em> L.f. Proc. Nova Scotia Inst. Sci. 31(2): 101-8.
  • Hall, I. V.; Murray, R. A.; Jackson, L. P. 1974. The biology of Canadian weeds: 2. <em>Spiraea latifolia</em>. Canad. J. Pl. Sci. 54(1): 141-7.
  • Hall, I. V.; Murray, R. A.; Jackson, L. P. 1979. The Biology of Canadian weeds. 2. <em>Spiraea latifolia</em>. In: The Biology of Canadian weeds. Contributions 1-32. Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa. , 16-22 pages. (Publication 1693)
  • Hall, I. V.; Wood, G. W.; Jackson, L. P. 1979. The Biology of Canadian weeds. 30. <em>Pyrus melanocarpa</em> Willd. In: The Biology of Canadian weeds. Contributions 1-32. Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa. , 348-53 pages. (Publication 1693)
  • Hancock, J. F. et.al. 2004. Taxonomic variation among North and South American subspecies of <em>Fragaria Virginian</em> Miller and <em>Fragaria chiloensis</em> (L.) Miller. Canad. J. Bot. 82: 1632-1644.
  • Hardiman, N. A.; Culley, T. M. 2010. Reproductive success of cultivated <em>Pyrus calleryana</em> (Rosaceae) and establishment abiliity of invasive, hybrid progeny. Amer. J. Bot. 97: 1698-1706.
  • Hardin, J. W. 1973. The enigmatic chokeberries (<em>Aronia</em>, Rosaceae). Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 100: 178-184.
  • Hargrave, P. D. 1937. Seed germination of the saskatoon and pinchberry. Sci. Agr. Ottawa 17: 736-9.
  • Harkness, J. 1980. Rose classification. The Plantsman 2(3): 179-81.
  • Harper, R. M. 1916. An overlooked environmental factor for species of <em>Prunus</em>. Rhodora 18(213): 201-3.
  • Harrington, R. A.; Brown, B. J.; Reich, P. B. 1989. Ecophysiology of exotic and native shrubs in southern Wisconsin II. Oecologia 80: 368-373.
  • Harrington, R. A.; Brown, B. J.; Reich, P. B. 1989. Ecophysiology of exotic and native shrubs in southern Wisconsin I. Oecologia 80: 356-367.
  • Harris, G. H. 1926. The activity of apple and filbert roots especially during winter months. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 23: 414-22.
  • Harris, R. E. 1970. The genus <em>Amelanchier</em>. J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 95: 116-8.
  • Harrison, R. E. et.al. 1997. Morphological and molecular variation among populations of octoploid <em>Fragaria virginiana</em> and <em>F. chiloensis</em> (Rosaceae) from North America. Amer. J. Bot. 84: 612-620.
  • Haskell, G. 1966. The history, taxonomy and breeding system of apomictic British <em>Rubi</em>. In: Reproductive biology and taxonomy of vascular plants. Oxford. ,
  • Haskell, G. 1954. The genetic detection of natural crossing in blackberry. Genetica 27: 162-72.
  • Heath, P. V. 1992. The type of <em>Rosa carolina</em> Linne. Calyx 2(2): 80.
  • Heath, P. V. 1997. Commentary on the proposal to reject <em>Rosa eglanteria</em> Linne, with supplementary proposals to amend and authorize. Calyx 5: 121-6.
  • Hebda, R. J.; Chinnappa, C. C. 1994. Studies on pollen morphology of Rosaceae. Acta Botanica Gallica 141: 183-193.
  • Hedhly, A. et.al. 2004. Effect of temperature on pollen tube kinetics and dynamics in sweet cherry, <em>Prunus avium</em> (Rosaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 91: 558-564.
  • Hedlund, T. 1901. Monographie der Gattung <em>Sorbus</em>. Bih. Kongl. Svenska Vetensk.-Akad. Handl. 35(1): 1-147.
  • Hedlund, T. 1948. Concerning the rise of new biotypes within the genus <em>Sorbus</em>. Bot. Not. 101: 381-92. (In Swedish; English summary)
  • Hedrick, U. P. 1911. The plums of New York.
  • Hedrick, U. P. 1915. The cherries of New York. Rep. New York Agric. Exp. Sta. 22 (for 1914), II.. , 371 pages.
  • Hedrick, V. P. 1921. The pears of New York.
  • Heinicke, A. J. 1917. Factors influencing the abscission of flowers and partially developed fruits of the apple (<em>Pyrus malus</em> L.).
  • Heinken, T. 2000. Dispersal of plants by a dog in a deciduous forest. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 122: 449-467.
  • Heinrich, B. 1995. Bumblebee ecology. WildEarth 5(2): 45-7.
  • Heit, C. E. 1938. Additional data on black cherry germination.
  • Heit, C. E. 1937. Treatment of black cherry seed to secure first year germination.
  • Herrera, C. M.; Jordano, P. 1981. <em>Prunus mahaleb</em> and birds: the high-efficiency seed dispersal system of a temperate fruiting tree. Ecol. Monogr. 51: 203-18.
  • Herrero, M.; Arbeloa, A. 1989. Influence of the pistil on pollen tube kinetics in peach (<em>Prunus persica</em>). Amer. J. Bot. 76(10): 1441-7.
  • Herring, P. 1925. Classifications of <em>Rosa</em>. Dansk Bot. Ark. 4(9): 1-24.
  • Herron, P.M. et.al. 2007. Invasive plants and their ecological strategies: prediction and explanation of woody plant invasion in New England. Diversity and Distributions 13: 633-644.
  • Heslop-Harrison, Y. 1959. Natural and induced rooting of the stem apex in <em>Rubus</em>. Ann. Bot. 23: 307-18.
  • Hess, W. J. 1976. A note on <em>Spiraea betulifolia</em> (Rosaceae). Baileya 20(1): 25-8.
  • Hildebrand, E.; Skelly, J. M.; Fredericksen, T. S. 1996. Foliar response of ozone-sensitve hardwood tree species from 1991 to 1993 in the Shenandoah National Park, Virginia. Canad. J. Forest Res. 26: 658-69. (French summary)
  • Hilton, R. J.; Jaswal, A. S.; Teskey, B. J. E.; Barabas, B. 1965. Rest period studies on seeds on <em>Amelanchier, Prunus</em> and <em>Sorbus</em>. Canad. J. Pl. Sci. 45: 79-85.
  • Hjelmqvist, H. 1957. The apomictic development of <em>Malus sieboldii</em>. Bot. Not. 110: 455-67.
  • Hockman, J. G.; Chapman, J. A. 1983. Comparative feeding habits of red foxes and gray foxes in Maryland. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 110: 276-285.
  • Hodgdon, A. R.; Steele, F. 1962. Glandularity in <em>Rubus allegheniensis</em> Porter. Rhodora 64: 161-8.
  • Hogdon, A. R.; Steele, F. 1966. <em>Rubus</em> subgenus Eubatus in New England, a conspectus. Rhodora 68: 474-513.
  • Holloway, P. S.; Matheke, G. E. M. 2003. Seed germination of burnet, <em>Sanguisorba</em> ssp. Native Plants J. 4: 95-99.
  • Hooker, J. D. 1898. <em>Amelanchier canadensis</em>, Medic. var. <em>oblongifolia</em>, Torr. & Gr. Bot. Mag. 124: pl. 7619.
  • Hooker, W. J. 1838. <em>Pyrus arbutifolia</em>. Arbutus-leaved <em>Aronia</em>. Bot. Mag. 65: pl. 3668.
  • Hooper, J.; Bullington, R. A. 1972. Invasion of woody plants in abandoned soil bank area of Pine Rock Preserve in Ogle County. Trans. Illinois State Acad. Sci. 65: 58-67.
  • Hoover, K. B. 1961. Hawthorn studies in Pennsylvania in relation to wildlife values.
  • Horsley, S. B. 1977. Allelopathic inhibition of black cherry by fern, grass, goldenrod, and aster. Canad. J. Forest Res. 7: 205-16.
  • Horsley, S. B. 1993. Mechanisms of interference between hay-scented fern and black cherry. Canad. J. Forest Res. 23: 2059-69.
  • Horsley, S. B. 1977. Allelopathic inhibition of black cherry. II. Inhibition by woodland grass, ferns, and club moss. Canad. J. Forest Res. 7: 515-9.
  • Horsley, S. B. et.al. 1983. Interference by weeds and deer with Allegheny hardwood reproduction. Canad. J. Forest Res. 13: 61-69
  • Hoss, G. A. 2001. Propagation protocol for ninebark (<em>Physocarpus opulifolius)</em>. Native Plants J. 2: 60-61.
  • Hough, A. F. 1953. Preliminary recommendations for the management of black cherry on the northern Allegheny Plateau. J. Forest. 51: 184-8.
  • Hough, A. F. 1959. Zoning for the management of black cherry on the Allegheny Plateau. J. Forest. 57: 353-7.
  • Hough, A. G. 1960. Silvical characteristics of black cherry.
  • Hoyt, S. F. 1957. Ecology of the pileated woodpecker. Ecology 38: 246-56.
  • Hrynkiewicz-Sudnik, J. 1972. <em>Cerasus avium</em> (L.) Moench. Its geographical distribution, geological characteristics and studies on variability. Prace Bot. Univ. Wroclawsk. 13: 1-172. (In Polish; English summary, 115-123)
  • Hsu, P. S.; Li, L. C. 1980. A quantitative analysis of herbarium materials of the <em>Photinia villosa</em> complex. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 18(3): 259-65. (In Chinese; English summary)
  • Huber, H. 1961. Rosaceae. In: Illus. Flora Mittel-Europa. 2nd ed. Vol. 4(2a). , 231-438 pages.
  • Huber, H. 1963. Die Verwandtschaftsverholtnisse der Rosifloren. Mitt. Bot. Staatssamml. Munchen 5: 1-48.
  • Huckins, C. A. 1972. A revision of the sections of the genus <em>Malus</em> Miller. Ph.D. Thesis Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY398 p.
  • Hudson, J. P. 1959. Effects of environment on <em>Rubus idaeus</em> L. I. Morphology and development of the red raspberry plant. J. Hort. Sci. 34: 163-9.
  • Huebner, C. D. 2003. Vulnerability of oak-dominated forests in West Virginia to invasive exotic plants: temporal and spatial patterns of nine exotic species using herbarium records and land classification data. Castanea 68: 1-14.
  • Hunnewell, F. W. 1923. An extended range for <em>Amelanchier amabilis</em>. Rhodora 23(267): 71-2.
  • Hunter, J. C.; Mattice, J. A. 2002. The spread of woody exotics into the forests of a northeastern landscape, 1938-1999. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 129: 220-227.
  • Hurst, C. C. 1941. Notes on the origin and evolution of our garden roses. II. Modern garden roses (1800-1940). J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 66: 242-50, 282-9.
  • Hurst, C. C. 1941. Notes on the origin and evolution of our garden roses. I. Ancient garden roses (2000 B.C. to A.D. 1800). J. Roy. Hort. Soc. 66: 73-82.
  • Husch, B. 1954. The regeneration of <em>Prunus serotina</em> in northwestern Pennsylvania following cutting. Ecology 35: 11-7.
  • Hutson, R. 1925. The honeybee as an agent in the pollination of pears, apples, and cranberries. J. Econ. Entomol. 18: 387-91.
  • Hyatt, L. A. 1999. Differences between seed bank composition and field recruitment in a temperate zone deciduous forest. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 142: 31-38.
  • Hyland, F. 1943. New combinations in <em>Pyrus</em>. Rhodora 45: 28.
  • Hélye, D. 1935. Etude sur les Spirees. Bull. Soc. Dendrol. France 1935: 17-24.
  • Iketani, H.; Ohashi, H. 1991. Anatomical structure of fruits and evolution of the tribe Sorbeae in the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Jap. J. Bot. 66: 319-351. (In English; Japanese summary)
  • Innes, R. L.; Remphrey, W. R.; Lenz, L. M. 1989. An analysis of the development of single and double flowers in <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em>. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 1071-1079. (French summary)
  • Innis, A. F. et.al. 2011. Genetic diversity in the invasive <em>Rubus phoenicolasius</em> as compared to the native <em>rubus argutus</em> using inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers. Biological Invasions 13: 1735-1738.
  • Iverson, R. 1981. Amelanchiers. Amer. Horticulturist 60(10): 26-7, 36-7.
  • Jackson, G. 1934. The morphology of the flowers of <em>Rosa</em> and certain closely related genera. Amer. J. Bot. 21: 453-66.
  • Jackson, G. 1926. The morphology and anatomy of the flowers of <em>Rosa</em> and certain closely related genera. M.S. Thesis Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY56 figs. + 33 p.
  • Jackson, J. E. 2003. Biology of apples and pears. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge. , 488 pages. (ISBN 0521380189)
  • Jankun, A. 1993. Evolutionary significance of apomixis in the genus <em>Sorbus</em> (Rosaceae). Fragm. Flor. Geobot. 38: 627-86. (In Polish; English summary)
  • Jarvis, C. E. 1992. Seventy-two proposals for the conservation of types of selected Linnaean generic names, the report of Subcommittee 3C on the lectotypification of Linnaean generic names. Taxon 41: 552-83.
  • Jedlicka, J.; Vandermeer, J. 2004. Gypsy moth defoliation of oak trees and a positive response of red maple and black cherry: an example of indirect interaction. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 152: 231-236.
  • Jennings, D. L. 1971. Some genetic factors affecting fruit development in raspberries. New Phyt. 70: 361-70.
  • Jennings, D. L. 1971. Some genetic factors affecting the development of endocarp, endosperm and embryo in raspberries. New Phyt. 70: 885-95.
  • Jennings, D. L. 1988. Raspberries and blackberries. Their breeding, diseases and growth. Academic Press, London, New York.
  • Jennings, D. L.; Topham, P. B. 1971. Some consequences of raspberry pollen dilution for its germination and for fruit development. New Phyt. 70: 371-80.
  • Jensen, K. I. N.; Hall, I. V. 1979. The biology of Canadian weeds: 36. <em>Rubus hispidus</em> L. Canad. J. Pl. Sci. 59(3): 769-76.
  • Jesse, L. C. et.al. 2006. Insect pollinators of the invasive plant, <em>Rosa multiflora</em> (Rosaceae), in Iowa, USA. Weed Biol. Manag. 6: 235-240.
  • Jesse, L. C. et.al. 2010. Quantifying the levels of sexual reproduction and clonal spread in the invasive plant, <em>Rosa multiflora</em>. Biological Invasions 12: 1847-1854.
  • Jessen, K. 1958. On hydrochorous dissemination of <em>Rosa rugosa</em> and other species of the genus. Bot. Tidsskr. 54: 353-66. (In Danish; English summary)
  • Johnston, B. C. 1985. Studies in <em>Potentilla</em>. I. Key to North American sections. Phytologia 57: 292-302.
  • Jones, A. L.; Aldwinckle, H. S. (eds.) (1990): 1990. The compendium of apple and pear diseases. APS Press, St. Paul, MN. , 100 pages. (170 color photos, 26 b&w figs.)
  • Jones, G. N. 1946. American species of <em>Amelanchier</em>. Illinois Biol. Monogr. 20(2), Urbana, IL. , 126 pages. (For review - see Rhodora 48:129-134. 1946. & Madroño 8:237-240. 1946. & Castanea 11(4):133. 1946.)
  • Jones, G. N. 1953. Nomenclature of American Mountain-ash. Rhodora 55(660): 358-60.
  • Jones, G. N. 1939. A synopsis of the North American species of <em>Sorbus</em>. J. Arnold Arbor. 20: 1-43.
  • Jordano, P. 1993. Pollination biology of <em>Prunus mahaleb</em> L.: deferred consequences of gender variation for fecundity and seed size. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 50: 65-84.
  • Jordano, P. 1995. Frugivore-mediated selection on fruit and seed size: birds ans St. Lucie's cherry, <em>Prunus mahaleb</em>. Ecology 76(8): 2627-39.
  • Joy, D. A.; Young, D. R. 1996. <em>Juniperus virginiana</em> as a possible nurse plant for woody seedlings on a Virginia barrier island. ()
  • Juel, H. O. 1918. Beitroge zur Blutenanatomie und zur Systematik der Rosaceen. Kongl. Svenska Vetenskapsakad. Handl. 58(5): 1-81.
  • Kalkman, C. 1988. The phylogeny of Rosaceae. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 98: 37-59.
  • Kalla, S. E.; Ashman, T. L. 2002. The effects of pollen competition on progeny vigor in <em>Fragaria virginiana</em> (Rosaceae) depend on progeny growth environment. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163: 335-340.
  • Kalman, C. 1988. The phylogeny of the Rosaceae. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 98: 37-59.
  • Kania, W. 1973. Entwicklungsgeschichtliche Untersuchungen an Rosaceenbluten. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 93: 175-246. (In German, English summary)
  • Kapoor, B. M. et.al. 1987. Annotated list of the chromosome numbers of the vascular flora of northeastern America V. Naturaliste Canad. 114: 105-116.
  • Keep, E. 1972. Variability in the wild raspberry. New Phyt. 71(5): 915-24.
  • Keep, E. 1964. Sepaloidy in the red raspberry, <em>Rubus idaeus</em> L. Canad. J. Genet. Cytol. 6: 52-60.
  • Keep, E. 1969. Accessory buds in the genus <em>Rubus</em> with particular reference to <em>R. idaeus</em> L. Ann. Bot. 33: 191-204.
  • Kellogg, A. A. et.al. 2011. Morphological studies of developing <em>Rubus</em> prickles suggest that they are modified glandular trichomes. Botany 89: 217-226.
  • Kemp, J. R. et al. et.al. 1993. Floral development of <em>Rosa setigera</em>. Canad. J. Bot. 71(1): 74-86.
  • Kemp, J. R.; Kevan, P. G.; Posluszny, U. 1994. Morphological differences and changes of the gynoecium in short-lived flowers of <em>Rosa setigera</em> Michaux and their relationships to dioecy. Int. J. Plant Sci. 154(4): 550-6.
  • Kerr, E. A. 1954. Seed development in blackberries. Canad. J. Bot. 32: 654-72.
  • Kevan, P. G. et al. et.al. 1990. Cryptic dioecy and insect pollination in <em>Rosa setigera</em> Michx. (Rosaceae), a rare plant of Carolinian Canada. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 40(3): 229-43.
  • Kichina, V. V.; Ogol'tsova, T. P. 1975. Spontaneous polyploids in the red raspberry (<em>Rubus idaeus</em> L.). Soviet Genet. 9(6): 796-7. (Ref. in Bibliogr. Agric. 39(10):212222. 1975; transl. 1975.)
  • King, J. L. 1994. Persistence of black cherry, white ash, and tulip poplar in an old-growth beech-maple forest. , Thesis Univ. Illinois, Chicago,
  • Klackenberg, J. 1983. The holarctic complex <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em> (Rosaceae). Nordic J. Bot. 3: 181-191.
  • Kline, G. J.; Sorensen, P. D. 2008. A revision of <em>Agrimonia</em> (Rosaceae) in North and Central America. Brittonia 60: 11-33.
  • Knapp, A. K.; Carter, G. A. 1998. Variability in leaf optical properties among 26 species from a broad range of habitats. Amer. J. Bot. 85: 940-946.
  • Koehne, E. 1890. Die Gattungen der Pomaceen. Berlin. , 33 pages.
  • Koehne, E. 1911. Die Gliederung von <em>Prunus</em> subg. <em>Padus</em>. Verh. Bot. Vereins Prov. Brandenburg 52: 101-8.
  • Koehne, E. 1915. Zur Kenntnis von <em>Prunus</em> grex <em>Calycopadus</em> und grex <em>Gymnopadus</em> sect. <em>Laurocerasus</em>. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 52: 279-333. (In German)
  • Koidzumi, G. 1934. A synopsis of the genus <em>Malus</em>. Acta Phytotax. Geobot. 3: 179-96.
  • Koopman, W. J. M. et.al. 2008. AFLP markers as a tool to reconstruct complex relationships: a case study in <em>Rosa</em> (Rosaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 95: 353-366.
  • Kovanda, M. 1961. Flower and fruit morphology of <em>Sorbus</em> in correlation to the taxonomy of the genus. Preslia 33: 1-16.
  • Kovanda, M. 1965. On the generic concepts in the Maloideae. Preslia 37: 27-34.
  • Kovanda, M.; Pouzar, Z. 1982. (666) Proposal to conserve <em>Sorbus</em> L. 1753 with the species <em>Sorbus aucuparia</em> L. as its type. Taxon 31: 340-1.
  • Kraft, T.; Nybom, H. 1995. DNA fingerprinting and biometry can solve some taxonomic problems in apomictic blackberries (<em>Rubus</em> subgen. <em>Rubus</em>). Watsonia 20: 329-43.
  • Kral, R. 1981. Some distributional reports of weedy or naturalized foreign species of vascular plants for the southern states, particularly Alabama and middle Tennessee. Castanea 46: 334-9.
  • Kruschke, E. P. 1955. The hawthorns of Wisconson. I. Status, objectives, and methods of collecting and preparing specimens. Milwaukee Public Mus. Publ. Bot. 2: 1-124.
  • Kruschke, E. P. 1965. Contributions to the taxonomy of <em>Crataegus</em>. Milwaukee Public Mus. Publ. Bot. 3: 1-273.
  • Kugel, A. R. 1958. Variation in the <em>Spiraea alba-latifolia</em> complex. Ph.D. Dissertation Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI124 p. (See also Diss. Abstr. 19(6):1183-1184. 1958)
  • Kuhns, L. J.; Fretz, T. A. 1979. Potential use of leaf enzymes for identification of roses. Ohio Rep. Res. Devel. Agric. Home Econ. Nat. Res. 64(4): 51-3. (Ref. in Bibliogr. Agric., 44(3-4): 021561. 1980.)
  • Kßrpßti, Z. E. 1967. Taxonomische Betrachtungen am genus <em>Prunus</em>. Feddes Repert. 75: 47-53.
  • LaFleur, N. et.al. 2009. Does frugivory by European starlings (<em>Sturnus vulgaris</em>) facilitate germination in invasive plants? J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 136: 332-341.
  • Labrecque, M.; Barabe, D.; Vieth, J. 1985. Development of the fruit of <em>Prunus virginiana</em> (Rosaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 63: 242-51. (In French; English summary)
  • Labrecque, M.; Barabe, D.; Vieth, J. 1985. Development of the fruit of <em>Prunus pensylvanica</em> L. f. (Rosaceae). Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. Biol. VÚg. 7: 39-53. (In French; English summary)
  • Lamont, E. E.; Fitzgerald, J. M. 2001. Noteworthy plants reported from the Torrey Range- 2000. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 128: 409-414.
  • Lance, R. 1995. The hawthorns of the southeastern United States.
  • Landry, P. 1976. Taxonomy and distribution of <em>Amelanchier arborea</em> (Michx. f.) Fern. in Quebec and throught the Maritimes. Naturaliste Canad. 103(4): 377-85. (In French; English summary)
  • Landry, P. 1975. The concept of species and the taxonomy of the genus <em>Amelanchier</em> (Rosaceae). Bull. Soc. Bot. France 122(5-6): 243-51. (In French)
  • Langenfeld, W. 1971. Die Evolution der Gattung <em>Malus</em> Mill. Wiss. Z. Univ. Rostock, Reihe Math. 20: 49-51.
  • Langord, L. R. 1935. Seasonal influences upon the effect of shading in regard to setting of sour cherry fruits. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 33: 234-6.
  • Larsson, E. G. K. 1969. Experimental taxonomy as a base for breeding in northern <em>Rubi</em>. Hereditas 63: 283-351.
  • Lauri, P. E. 1992. Donnees sur le contexte vegetatif lie à la floraison chez le cerisier (<em>Prunus avium</em>). Canad. J. Bot. 70: 1848-59. (In French; English summary)
  • Lawrey, J. D. 1977. Trace metal accumulation by plant species from a coal strip-mining area in Ohio. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 104: 368-375.
  • Leak, W. B. 1975. Age distribution in virgin red spruce and northern hardwoods. Ecology 56(6): 1451-4.
  • Leavitt, R. G. 1905. The defences of the cock-spur thorn. Pl. World 8: 239-44.
  • Ledbetter, M. C. 1960. Anatomical and morphological comparisons of normal and physiologically dwarfed seedlings of <em>Rhodotypos tetrapetala</em> and <em>Prunus persica</em>. Contr. Boyce Thompson Inst. Pl. Res. 20: 437-58.
  • Lee, S. et.al. 2011. New insights into pollen morphology and its implications in the phylogeny of <em>Sanguisorba</em> L. (Rosaceae; Sanguisorbeae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 291: 227-242.
  • Lee, S.; Lee, J. 1998. A taxonomic study of the <em>Filipendula</em> Adans. (Rosaceae) on the basis of fruit morphology. Korean J. Pl. Taxon. 28: 1-24. (In Korean)
  • Lee, S.; Wen, J. 2001. A phylogentic analysis of <em>Prunus</em> and tha Amygdaloidaea (Rosaceae) using ITS sequences of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Amer. J. Bot. 88: 150-160.
  • Lei, T. T. et.al. 2002. Effects of <em>Rhododendron maximum</em> thickets on tree seed dispersal, seedling morphology, and survivorship. Int. J. Plant Sci. 163: 991-1000.
  • Lersten, N. R.; Horner, H. T. 2000. Calcium oxalate crystal types and trends in their distribution patterns in leaves of <em>Prunus</em> (Rosaceae: Prunoideae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 224: 83-96.
  • Lersten, N. R.; Horner, H. T. 2004. Calium oxalate crystal macropattern development during <em>Prunus virginiana</em> (Rosaceae) leaf growth. Canad. J. Bot. 82: 1800-1808.
  • Lewis, W. H. 1958. Minor forms of North American species of <em>Rosa</em>. Rhodora 60(717): 237-43.
  • Lewis, W. H. 1957. A monograph of the genus <em>Rosa</em> in North America east of the Rocky Mountains. Ph.D. Thesis Univ. Virginia459 p. (Diss. Abstr. 17:2389. 1957.)
  • Lewis, W. H. 1958. The roses of Virginia and West Virginia. Castanea 23: 77-88.
  • Lewis, W. H. 2008. <em>Rosa carolina</em> (rosaceae) subspecies and hybrids in eastern and midwestern United States, Canada, and Mexico. Novon 18: 192-198.
  • Lewis, W. H. 1970. Species roses in the United States and their relation to modern roses. Amer. Rose Ann. 55: 78-85.
  • Lewis, W. H. 1958. A monograph of the genus <em>Rosa</em> in North America. III. <em>R. setigera</em>. Southw. Naturalist 3: 154-74.
  • Lewis, W. H. 1957. An introduction to the genus <em>Rosa</em> with special reference to <em>R. acicularis</em>. Virginia J. Sci. 8: 197-202.
  • Likhonos, F. D. 1974. A survey of the species in the genus <em>Malus</em> Mill. Trudy Prikl. Bot. 52(3): 16-34. (In Russian; English summary)
  • Liljefors, A. 1953. Studies on propagation, embryology, and pollination in <em>Sorbus</em>. Acta Horti Berg. 16: 277-329.
  • Lincoln, F. B.; McCann, L. P. 1937. Polyploidy in native species of <em>Malus</em>. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 34: 26.
  • Lindenhofer, A; Weber, A 1999. The spiraeoid androecium of Pyroideae and Amygdaloideae (Rosaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 121: 583-605.
  • Lindenhofer, A; Weber, A 1999. Polyandry in Rosaceae: evidence for a spiral origin of the androecium in Spiraeoideae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 121: 553-582.
  • Lindenhofer, A; Weber, A. 2000. Structural and developmental diversity of the androecium of Rosoideae (Rosaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 122: 63-91.
  • Lindley, J. 1822. Observations on the natural group of plants called Pomaceae. Trans. Linn. Soc. London Bot. 13: 88-106.
  • Lindley, J. 1828. <em>Amelanchier sanguinea</em>. Bot. Reg. 14: pl. 1171.
  • Lindsey, A. A. 1963. Accuracy of duration temperature summing and its use for <em>Prunus serrulata</em>. Ecology 44: 149-51.
  • Little, E. L. 1953. Five varietal transfers of United States trees. Phytologia 4: 305-10.
  • Lo, E. Y. Y. et.al. 2010. Fine-scale comparisons of genetic variability in seed families of asexually and sexually reproducing <em>Crataegus</em> (Hawthorn; Rosaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 97: 1014-1024.
  • Loats, K. V.; Rebbeck, J. 1999. Interactive effects of ozone and elevated carbon dioxide on the growth and physiology of black cherry, green ash, and yellow poplar seedlings. Environmental Pollution 106: 237-248.
  • Longley, A. E. 1924. Cytological studies in the genus <em>Rubus</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 11: 249-82.
  • Longley, A. E. 1924. Cytological studies in the genus <em>Crataegus</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 11: 295-317.
  • Longley, A. E.; Darrow, G. M. 1924. Cytological studies of diploid and polyploid forms in raspberries. J. Agric. Res. 27: 737-48.
  • Lotowycz, B. 1994. An occurrence of <em>Rosa nitida</em> on Long Island. Long Island Botanical Society Newsletter 4: 2.
  • Lousley, J. E. 1963. <em>Prunus serotina</em>. Bot. Soc. Brit. Isles Proc. 5: 122-3.
  • Love, A. 1954. Cytotaxanomical remarks on some American species of circumpolar taxa. Svensk Bot. Tidskr. 48: 211-32.
  • Lu, L. T.; Li, C. L.; Li, G. 1990. Pollen morphology of <em>Photinia</em> (Rosaceae) and its systematic significance. Cathaya 2: 127-38.
  • Lundgren, M. R. 2004. Influence of land use and site characteristics on invasive plant abundance in the Quinebaug Highlands of southern New England. Northeastern Naturalist 11: 313-332.
  • Luneva, N. N. 1995. Variations of petal morphological characters and diversity of forms in the genus <em>Prunus</em> (Rosaceae). Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Lenengrad) 80: 79-84. (In Russian; English summary)
  • Luneva, N. N. 1994. The petal size as an additional morphological character in the taxonomy of <em>Prunus</em> (Rosaceae). Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Lenengrad) 79(6): 88-94. (In Russian)
  • Luo, X.; Dong, M. 2002. Architectural plasticity in response to soil moisture in the stoloniferous herb, <em>Duchesnea indica</em>. Acta Bot. Sin. 44: 97-100.
  • Luthra, R.; Matta, N. K. 1990. Seed proteins of the family Rosaceae: characterization studies and homologies. J. Indian Bot. Soc. 69: 321-4.
  • Mabberley, D. J. 2002. <em>Potentilla</em> and <em>Fragaria</em> (Rosaceae) reunited. Telopea 9: 793-801.
  • Mabberley, D. J.; Jarvis, C. E.; Juniper, B. E. 2001. The name of the apple. Telopea 9: 421-430.
  • MacDaniels, L. H. 1940. The morphology of the apple and other pome fruits. Cornell Univ. Agric. Exp. Sta. Mem. 230: 1-32.
  • Macklin, J. A.; Phipps, J. B. 2006. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em> series <em>Coccineae</em>. I. Delimitation of series. Canad. J. Bot. 84: 70-86.
  • Macklin, J. A.; Phipps, J. B.; Boufford, D. E. 2000. Charles Sargnet's type concept: a guide to interpreting his names in <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae). Harvard Papers in Botany 5: 123-128.
  • Mandrik, V. Y.; Petrus, Y. P. 1971. Differentiation of seedbud, development of female gametophyte and embryogenesis in <em>Rubus idaeus</em> L. and <em>Rubus caesius</em> L. Ukrayins'k Bot. Zhurn. 28: 469-76. (In Ukranian; English summary)
  • Manzur, M. I.; Courtney, S. P. 1984. Influence of insect damage in fruits of hawthorn on bird foraging and seed dispersal. Oikos 43: 265-70.
  • Marks, P. L. 1974. The role of pin cherry (<em>Prunus pensylvanica</em>) in the maintenance of stability in northern hardwood ecosystems. Ecol. Monogr. 44: 73-88.
  • Marks, P. L. 1971. The role of <em>Prunus pensylvanica</em> L. in the rapid revegetation of disturbed sites. Ph.D. Dissertation Yale Univ., New Haven, CT119 p.
  • Martine, C. T. et.al. 2008. Fifteen woody species with potential for invasiveness in New England. Rhodora 110: 345-353.
  • Mason, E. A. 1966. The slender shadbushes. Cornell Plantations 22: 19-20.
  • Masse, R. J.; Vulinec, K. 2010. Possible impact of multiflora rose on breeding-bird diversity in riparian forest fragments of central Delaware. Northeastern Naturalist 17: 647-658.
  • Mayer, D. F. 1983. Apple pollination. Amer. Bee J. 123: 272-3.
  • Maynard, C. C. et.al. 1991. Black cherry (iP. serotina</em> Ehrh.). Biotech. Agric. Forest. 16: 3-22.
  • McAllister, H. 1985. The <em>aucuparia</em> section of <em>Sorbus</em>. The Plantsman 6(4): 248-55.
  • McCown, M. 1943. Anatomical and chemical aspects of abscisson of fruits of the apple. Bot. Gaz. 105: 212-20.
  • McDaniel, J. C. 1974. Nomenclature: perennial problem in <em>Amelanchier arborea</em>. Amer. Nurseryman 139(7): 66-8.
  • McDaniels, L. H. 1937. Some anatomical aspects of apple flower and fruit abscisson. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 34: 122-9.
  • McDonnell, M. J. 1986. Old field vegetation height and the dispersal pattern of bird-disseminated woody plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 113: 6-11.
  • McKay, S. M. 1973. A biosystematic study of the genus <em>Amelanchier</em> in Ontario. M.S. Thesis Univ. Toronto255 p.
  • McLean, F. T. 1933. Torrey Botanical Club, Meeting of October 19, 1932. Torreya 33: 21-4.
  • McMurray, N. 1987. <em>Prunus americana</em>. ()
  • McMurray, N. 1987. <em>Prunus virginiana</em>. ()
  • McMurray, N. E. 1987. <em>Prunus pensylvanica</em>. ()
  • McVaugh, R. 1943. The status of certain anomalous native crabapples in the eastern United States. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 70: 418-29.
  • McVaugh, R. 1973. Report of the Committee for Spermatophyta: conservation of generic names: proposal 329(3316) <em>Physocarpus</em> (Cambessedes) Maximowicz (1879), nom. conserv., vs. <em>Physocarpum</em> (A.P.De Candolle) Berchtold and Presl (1823), and <em>Epicostorus</e Taxon 22(1): 156.
  • McVaugh, R. 1952. Suggested phylogeny of <em>Prunus serotina</em> and other wide ranging phylads in North America. Brittonia 7: 317-346. (And other genera)
  • McVaugh, R. 1971. Report of the Committee for Spermatophyta: conservation of generic names: 14. Proposal 272. [3338 pars] <em>Aronia</em> Medikus. Taxon 20(2-3): 386.
  • McVaugh, R. 1951. A revision of the North American black cherries (<em>Prunus serotina</em> Ehrh. and relatives). Brittonia 7: 279-315.
  • Mead, E. 1821. An experimental inquiry into the botanical history, chemical properties and medicinal virtues of the <em>Spiraea tomentosa</em>. Med. Repos. 6: 255-72.
  • Meeuse, A. D. J. 1987. Comparative floral morphology of the Rosaceae and of the Rosidae in general. Phytomorphology 37(1): 103-12.
  • Meiners, S. J. 2007. Apparent competition: an impact of exotic shrub invasion on tree regeneration. Biological Invasions 9: 849-855. (Lonicera maackii & Rosa multiflora)
  • Mellichamp, T. L.; Matthews, J. F.; Smithka, P. J. 1987. New state and regional records of vascular plants in the Carolinas. Castanea 52: 95-111.
  • Melville, R. 1967. The problem of classification in the genus <em>Rosa</em>. Bull. Jard. Bot. Nat. Belg. 37: 39-44.
  • Mercure, M.; Bruneau, A. 2008. Hybridization between the escaped <em>Rosa rugosa</em> (Rosaceae) and native <em>R. blanda</em> in eastern North America. Amer. J. Bot. 95: 597-607.
  • Merriam, R. W. 2003. The abundance, distribution and edge associations of six non-indigenous, harmful plants across North Carolina. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 130: 283-291.
  • Merrill, E. K. 1978. Comparison of mature leaf architecture of three types in <em>Sorbus</em> L. (Rosaceae). Bot. Gaz. 139: 447-53.
  • Meyer, G. A.; Witmer, M. C. 1998. Influence of seed processing by frugivorous birds on germination success of three North American shrubs. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 140: 129-139.
  • Mikanagi, Y.; Yokoi, M.; Ueda, Y.; Saito, N. 1995. Flower flavonol and anthocyanin distribution in subgenus <em>Rosa</em>. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 23: 183-200.
  • Miller, E. S. 1872. Suffolk county plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 3: 56.
  • Mitchell, A. M. 1899. The white blackberry. Rhodora 1: 205-6.
  • Modlibowska, I. 1945. Pollen tube growth and embryo-sac development in apples and pears. J. Pomology 21: 57-89.
  • Moffett, A. A. 1931. The chromosome constitution of the Pomoideae. Proc. Roy. Soc. London Ser. B Biol. Sci. 108: 423-46.
  • Moore, G. et.al. 2007. Neotypification of <em>Rubus cuneifolius</em> Pursh (Rosaceae). Harvard Papers in Botany 11: 141-143.
  • Morber, B. E.; Miyanishi, K. 1995. Post-fire regeneration of black cherry and chokecherry in a southern Ontario oak savanna. (USDA Forest Serice Gen. Tech. Rep. INT-GTR-320)
  • Morden-Moore, A. L.; Willson, M. F. 1982. On the ecological significance of fruit color in <em>Prunus serotina</em> and <em>Rubus occidentalis</em>: field experiments. Canad. J. Bot. 60: 1554-60.
  • Morgan, D. R.; Soltis, D. E.; Robertson, K. R. 1994. Systematic and evolutionary implications of rbcL sequence variation in Rosaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 81: 890-903.
  • Morris, E. L. 1912. Shorter notes- an apparently new record for Rubus chamaemorus Linnaeus. Torreya 12: 88.
  • Muniyamma, M.; Phipps, J. B. 1979. Cytological proof of apomixis in <em>Crataegus</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 66(2): 149-55.
  • Muniyamma, M.; Phipps, J. B. 1984. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em>. XI. Further cytological evidence for the occurrence of apomixis in North American hawthorns. Canad. J. Bot. 62: 2316-24.
  • Muniyamma, M.; Phipps, J. B. 1985. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em>. XII. Cytological evidence for sexuality in some diploid and tetraploid species of North American hawthorns. Canad. J. Bot. 63: 1319-24.
  • Muniyamma, M.; Phipps, J. B. 1979. Meiosis and polyploidy of Ontario species of <em>Crataegus</em> in relation to their systematics. Canad. J. Genet. Cytol. 21(2): 231-41.
  • Myers, J. A. et.al. 2004. Seed dispersal by white-tailed deer: implications for long-distance dispersal, invasion, and migration of plants in eastern North America. Oecologia 139: 35-44.
  • Myster, R. W.; Pickett, S. T. A. 1990. Initial conditions, history and successional pathways in ten contrasting old fields. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 124: 231-8.
  • Naruhashi, N. et.al. 1991. Karyological studies of <em>Duchesnea</em> Rosaceae. Cytologia 56: 143-150.
  • Naruhashi, N. et.al. 1996. The floral biology of <em>Duchesnea</em> (Rosaceae). Plant Species Biol. 11: 173-184.
  • Nash, G. V. 1920. <em>Crataegus phaenopyrum</em>. Addisonia 5: 33.
  • Nash, G. V. 1919. <em>Crataegus macrosperma</em>. Addisonia 4: 35.
  • Nash, G. V. 1919. <em>Crataegus succulenta</em>. Addisonia 4: 5-6.
  • Nash, G. V. 1918. <em>Spiraea thunbergii</em>. Addisonia 3: 63-5.
  • Nebel, B. R. 1939. Longevity of pollen in apple, pear, plum, peach, apricot, and sour cherry. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 37: 130-1.
  • Nelson, N. D. 1978. Xylem ethylene, phenol-oxidizing enzymes, and nitrogen and heartwood formation in walnut and cherry. Canad. J. Bot. 56(6): 626-34.
  • Nelson, N. D. 1976. Gross influences on heartwood formation in black walnut and black cherry trees.
  • Nesom, G. L. 2000. Callery pear (<em>Pyrus calleryana</em>-Rosaceae) naturalized in North Carolina. Rhodora 102: 361-364.
  • Nielsen, E. L. 1939. A taxonomic study of the genus <em>Amelanchier</em> in Minnesota. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 22: 160-206.
  • Nizhnikov, V. S. 1977. On the taxonomy of <em>Cerasus pumila</em> (L.) Michx. and <em>C. besseyi</em> (Bailey) Lunell (Rosaceae). Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Lenengrad) 62(4): 533-6. (In Russian)
  • Norby, R. J.; Kozlowski, T. T. 1980. Allelopathic potential of ground cover species on <em>Pinus resinosa</em> seedlings. Pl. & Soil 57: 363-74.
  • Nybom, H. 1988. Apomixis versus sexuality in blackberries (<em>Rubus</em> subgen. <em>Rubus</em>, Rosaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 160(3-4): 207-18.
  • Nybom, H. 1985. Active self-pollination in blackberries (<em>Rubus</em> subgen. <em>Rubus</em>, Rosaceae). Nordic J. Bot. 5(6): 521-5.
  • Nybom, H.; Rogstad, S. H.; Schaal, B. A. 1990. Genetic variation detected by use of the M13 "DNA fingerprint" probe in <em>Malus, Prunus</em>, and <em>Rubus</em> (Rosaceae). Theor. Appl. Genet. 79: 153-6.
  • Ode, B. 1996. <em>Crataegus crus-galli</em> L. Gorteria 22: 165-6. (In Dutch)
  • Oh, S. H. 2004. (1619) Proposal to conserve the name <em>Physocarpus opulifolius</em> (L.) Maxim. against <em>Physocarpus opulifolius</em> Raf. (Rosaceae). Taxon 53: 212-213.
  • Oldén, E. J. 1953. Sexual and apomictic seed formation in <em>Malus sieboldii</em> Rehd. Bot. Not. 106: 105-28.
  • Oldén, E. J.; Nybom, N. 1968. On the origin of <em>Prunus cerasus</em> L. Hereditas 59: 327-45.
  • Olson, A. R.; Steeves, T. A. 1982. Structural changes in the developing fruit wall of <em>Amelanchier alnifolia</em>. Canad. J. Bot. 60: 1880-7.
  • Overath, R. D.; Hamrick, J. L. 1998. Allozyme diversity in <em>Amelanchier arborea</em> and <em>A. Laevis</em> (Rosaceae). Rhodora 100: 276-292.
  • Palmer, E. J. 1946. <em>Crataegus</em> in the northeastern and central United States and adjacent Canada. Brittonia 5: 471-490.
  • Palmer, E. J. 1932. <em>Crataegus arnoldiana</em> Addisonia 17: 33-4. (= C. mollis)
  • Palmer, E. J. 1943. The species concept in <em>Crataegus</em>. Chron. Bot. 7: 373-5.
  • Palmer, E. J. 1932. The <em>Crataegus</em> problem. J. Arnold Arbor. 13: 342-62.
  • Palmer, E. J. 1925. Synopsis of North American <em>Crataegi</em>. J. Arnold Arbor. 6: 5-128.
  • Panigrahi, G.; Dikshit, B. K. 1987. Systematics of the genus <em>Potentilla</em> L.: (Rosaceae Juss.): its infrageneric classification and evolutionary trends. Bull. Bot. Surv. India 27(1-4): 177-96.
  • Paratley, R. D. 1986. Vegetation-environment relations in a conifer swamp in central New York. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 113: 357-371.
  • Patterson, D. T. 1976. The history and distribution of five exotic weeds in North Carolina. Castanea 41: 177-80.
  • Pelc, S. 1984. Morphology and structure of wild apple (<em>Malus silvestris</em> Mill.) common pear ({Pyrus communis L.) and <em>Chaenomeles japonica</em> (Thunb.) Lindl. Seeds. Acta Soc. Bot. Poloniae 53(2): 159-70.
  • Pemberton, R. W.; Irving, D. W. 1990. Elaiosomes on weed seeds and the potential for myrmecochory in naturalized plants.
  • Pennypacker, J. Y. 1915. Observations on the beach plum: a study in plant variation. Ph.D. Dissertation Univ. Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA,
  • Pennypacker, J. Y. 1919. Observations on the beach plum, a study in plant variation. Contr. Bot. Lab. Morris Abor. Univ. Pennsylvania 4: 231-69.
  • Petrakhilev, I. M. 1958. Intergeneric hybrids of raspberries. Priroda (Sabaneev) 1958: 109-11. (In Russian)
  • Phipps, J. B. 2006. <em>Crataegus</em> series <em>Parvifoliae</em> and its putative hybrids in the southeastern United States. Sida 22: 423-445.
  • Phipps, J. B. 1981. Infra-generic ranks in <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae).
  • Phipps, J. B. 2005. A review of hybridization in North American hawthorns- another look at "the <em>Crataegus</em> problem". Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 92: 113-126.
  • Phipps, J. B. 1983. <em>Crataegus</em>- A nomenclator for sectional and serial names. Taxon 32: 598-604.
  • Phipps, J. B. 2008. Kruschke names in North American <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae): a correction and clarifications. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 2: 473.
  • Phipps, J. B. 1983. Biogeographic, taxonomic, and cladistic relationships between east asiatic and North American <em>Crataegus</em>. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 70: 667-700.
  • Phipps, J. B. 1998. Synopsis of <em>Crataegus</em> series <em>Apiifoliae</em>, <em>Cordatae</em>, <em>Microcarpae</em>, and <em>Brevispinae</em>, (Rosaceae subfam. Maloideae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 475-491.
  • Phipps, J. B. 1988. <em>Crataegus</em> (Maloideae, Rosaceae) of the southeastern United States, I. Introduction and series <em>Aestivales</em>. J. Arnold Arbor. 69(4): 401-31.
  • Phipps, J. B. 1988. Typification of <em>Crataegus crus-galli</em> L. (Rosaceae) and nomenclatural notes on some related species of hawthorn. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 96(4): 359-69.
  • Phipps, J. B. 2007. Kruschke names in North American <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae). J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 1: 1011-1014. (for a correction and clarification see: J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 2:473. 2008.)
  • Phipps, J. B. 1984. Problems of hybridity in the cladistics of <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae). In: Plant Biosystematics. Academic Press, Toronto. , 417-38 pages.
  • Phipps, J. B. 2007. Miscellaneous typifications, new combinations and one new variety in North American <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae). J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 1: 1005-1010.
  • Phipps, J. B.; Cafferty, S.; Macklin, J. A. 2003. Lectotypification of <em>Crataegus coccinea</em> L. and its conspecificity with <em>C. pedicellata</em> Sarg. (Rosaceae). Taxon 52: 337-338.
  • Phipps, J. B.; Muniyamma, M. 1980. A taxonomic revision of <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae) in Ontario. Canad. J. Bot. 58: 1621-99.
  • Phipps, J. B.; Robertson, K. R.; Rohrer, J. R.; Smith, P. G. 1991. Origins and evolution of subfam. Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 16: 303-32.
  • Phipps, J. B.; Smith, P. G.; Rohrer, J. R. 1990. A checklist of the subfamily Maloideae (Rosaceae). Canad. J. Bot. 68: 2209-69. (French summary)
  • Pisula, N. L.; Meiners, S. J. 2010. Relative allelopathic potential of invasive plant species in a young disturbed woodland. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 137: 81-87.
  • Ponomarenko, V. V. 1985. Evolution in the flower in the genus <em>Malus</em> Mill. Sborn. Nauch. Tr. Prikl. Bot. Genet. Selek. 99: 115-9. (In Russian; English summary)
  • Ponomarenko, V. V. 1978. On the systematics of <em>Malus baccata</em> (L.) Borkh. Trudy Prikl. Bot. 62(3): 24-35. (In Russian; English summary)
  • Poston, M. E.; Middendorf, G. A. 1988. Maturation characteristics of <em>Rubus pennsylvanicus</em> fruit: are black and red the same? Oecologia 77: 69-73.
  • Potter, D. et.al. 2007. Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Pl. Syst. Evol. 266: 5-43.
  • Potter, D. et.al. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships in Rosaceae inferred from chloroplast matK and trnL-trnF nucleotide sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 231: 77-89.
  • Potter, D. et.al. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships in the tribe Spiraeeae (Rosaceae) inferred from nucleotide sequence data. Pl. Syst. Evol. 266: 105-118.
  • Potter, D.; Luby, J. J.; Harrison, R. E. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships among species of <em>Fragaria</em> (Rosaceae) inferred from non-coding nuclear and chloroplast DNA sequences. Syst. Bot. 25: 337-348.
  • Power, N. 1980. <em>Crataegus</em>-insect relationships. , Unpubl. honours thesis Univ. Western Ontario, London, Ontario,
  • Pratt, C.; Einset, J. 1955. Development of the embryo sac in some American blackberries. Amer. J. Bot. 42: 637-45.
  • Pratt, C.; Einset, J.; Clausen, Robert T. 1958. Embryology, breeding behavior and morphological characteristics of apomictic, triploid <em>Rubus idaeus</em> L. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 85: 242-254.
  • Qian, G. Z. et.al. 2010. (1933) Proposal to conserve the name <em>Malus domestica</em> against <em>M. Pumila, M. communis, M. frutescens</em>, and <em>Pyrus dioica</em> (Rosaceae). Taxon 59: 650-652.
  • Quamme, H. A.; Layne, R. E. C.; Ronald, W. G. 1982. Relationship of supercooling to cold hardiness and the northern distribution of several cultivated and native <em>Prunus</em> species and hybrids. Canad. J. Pl. Sci. 62: 137-48.
  • Quimby, D. C. 1951. The life history and ecology of the jumping mouse <em>Zapus hudsonius</em>. Ecol. Monogr. 21: 61-95.
  • Raymond, O.; Biolley, J. P.; Jay, M. 1995. Fingerprinting the selection process of ancient roses by means of floral phenolic metabolism. Biochem. Syst. Ecol. 23: 555-65.
  • Rebbeck, J. 1996. Chronic ozone effects on three northeastern hardwood species: growth and biomss. Canad. J. Forest Res. 26: 1788-98. (French summary)
  • Redoute, P. J. 1817. Les roses. Avec le texte par cl. Ant. Thory. (Vol. 1. 1817-1819; Vol. 2. 1819-1821; Vol. 3. 1821-1824)
  • Reed, W. R. 1993. <em>Rosa multiflora</em>. ()
  • Rehder, A. 1936. On the history of the introduction of woody plants into North America. Natl. Hort. Mag. 15: 245-257.
  • Rehder, A. 1902. Webb's "Study of <em>Spiraea</em>". Bot. Gaz. 34: 246.
  • Reich, P. B.; Abrams, M. D.; et al. et.al. 1990. Fire affects ecophysiology and community dynamics of central Wisconsin oak forest regeneration. Ecology 71: 2179-90.
  • Remmy, K.; Gruber, F. 1993. Studies on the distribution and morphology of the wild apple (<em>Malus sylvestris</em> (L.) Mill.). Mitt. Deutsch. Dendrol. Ges. 81: 71-94. (In German; English summary)
  • Rickett, H. W. 1937. Forms of <em>Crataegus crus-galli</em>. Bot. Gaz. 98: 609-16.
  • Rickett, H. W. 1936. Forms of <em>Crataegus pruinosa</em>. Bot. Gaz. 97: 788-93.
  • Rickett, H. W. 1943. The inflorescence of <em>Crataegus</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 70: 489-95.
  • Riedhart, J. M.; Guard, A. T. 1957. On the anatomy of the roots of apple seedlings. Bot. Gaz. 118(3): 191-4.
  • Ristau, T. E.; Horsley, S. B. 1999. Pin cherry effects on Allegheny hardwood stand development. Canad. J. Forest Res. 29: 73-84.
  • Ritz, C. M.; Wissemann, V. 2003. Male correlated non-matroclinal character inheritance in reciprocal hybrids of <em>Rosa</em> section <em>Caninae</em> (DC.) Ser. (Rosaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 241: 213-221.
  • Roberts, A. V. et.al. (eds.) (2003): 2003. Encyclopedia of rose science. 3 Vols. Elsevier, Amsterdam. , 1450 pages. (ISBN 0122276205)
  • Robertson, C. 1894. Flowers and insects: Rosaceae and Compositae. Trans. St. Louis Acad. Sci. 6: 435-80.
  • Robertson, C. 1896. Flowers and insects. Trans. St. Louis Acad. Sci. 7: 151-179.
  • Robertson, D. J.; Robertson, M. C.; Tague, T. 1994. Colonization dynamics of four exotic plants in a northern Piedmont natural area. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 121: 107-18.
  • Robertson, K. R. 1972. (329) Nomina conservanda proposita: <em>Physocarpus</em>. Taxon 21: 211-2.
  • Robertson, K. R. 1983. Comment opposed to (670) proposal to conserve <em>Gillenia</em> (Rosaceae). Taxon 32: 306.
  • Robertson, K. R. 1974. The genera of Rosaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 55: 303-32; 344-401; 611-62.
  • Robertson, K. R.; Phipps, J. B.; Rohrer, J. R. 1992. Summary of leaves in the genera of Maloideae (Rosaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 79: 81-94.
  • Robertson, K. R.; Phipps, J. B.; Rohrer, J. R.; Smith, P. G. 1991. A synopsis of genera in Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst. Bot. 16: 376-94.
  • Robertson, M. 1984. The effect of environmental factors on flower color and petal number of <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em> L. M.S. Thesis Univ. Manitoba, Winnipeg,
  • Robinson, B. L. 1908. Notes on some plants of the northeastern America. Rhodora 10: 46-55.
  • Robinson, J. P.; Harris, S. A.; Juniper, B. E. 2001. Taxonomy of the genus <em>Malus</em> Mill. (Rosaceae) with emphasis on the cultivated apple, <em>Malus domestica</em> Borkh. Pl. Syst. Evol. 226: 35-58.
  • Robinson, W. A. 1982. Experimental taxonomy in the genus <em>Amelanchier</em> II: do the taxa in the genus <em>Amelanchier</em> form an agamic complex? Rhodora 84: 85-100.
  • Robinson, W. A. 1986. Effect of fruit ingestion on <em>Amelanchier</em> seed germination. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 113: 131-4.
  • Robinson, W. A.; Partanen, C. R. 1980. Experimental taxonomy in the genus <em>Amelanchier</em> I: a new look at the chromosome numbers of the <em>Amelanchier</em> species growing in the northeastern United States. Rhodora 82(831): 483-93.
  • Rodewald, A. D. et.al. 2010. Exotic shrubs as ephemeral ecological traps for nesting birds. Biological Invasions 12: 33-39. (Lonicera maackii, Rosa multiflora)
  • Rohde, A. S.; Ashman, T. L. 2010. Effects of florivory and inbreeding on reproduction in hermaphrodites of the wild strawberry <em>Fragaria virginiana</em>. Int. J. Plant Sci. 171: 175-184.
  • Rohrer, J. R. et.al. 2008. Phylogenetic analysis of North American plums (<em>Prunus</em> sect. <em>Prunocerasus</em>: Rosaceae) based on nuclear LEAFY and S6PDH sequences. J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 2: 401-414.
  • Rohrer, J. R. et.al. 2004. Microsatellite analysis of relationships among North american plums (<em>Prunus</em> sect. <em>Prunocerasus</em>, Rosaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 244: 69-75.
  • Rohrer, J. R.; Robertson, K. R.; Phipps, J. B. 1991. Variation in structure among fruits of Maloideae (Rosaceae) Amer. J. Bot. 78: 1617-35.
  • Rohrer, J. R.; Robertson, K. R.; Phipps, J. B. 1994. Floral morphology of Maloideae (Rosaceae) and its systematic relevance. Amer. J. Bot. 81(5): 574-81.
  • Rooney, T. P.; Dress, W. J. 1997. Patterns of plant diversity in overbrowsed primary and mature secondary hemlock-northern hardwood forest stands. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 124: 43-51.
  • Rose, R. C. 1919. After-ripening and germination of seeds of <em>Tilia, Sambucus,</em> and <em>Rubus</em>. Bot. Gaz. 67: 281-308.
  • Rossell, I. M.; Kesgen, J. M. 2003. The distribution and fruiting of red and black chokeberry (<em>Aronia arbutifolia</em> and <em>A. melanocarpa</em>) in a southern Appalachian fen. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 130: 202-205.
  • Rouffa, A. S.; Gunckel, J. E. 1951. A comparative study of vegetative shoot apices in the Rosaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 38: 290-300.
  • Rouffa, A. S.; Gunckel, J. E. 1951. Leaf initiation, origin, and patterns of pith development in the Rosaceae. Amer. J. Bot. 38: 301-7.
  • Rousi, A. 1965. Biosystematic studies on the species aggregate <em>Potentilla anserina</em> L. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 2: 47-112.
  • Rowley, G. D. 1956. Germination in <em>Rosa canina</em>. Amer. Rose Ann. 41: 70-3.
  • Rowley, G. D. 1976. Typification of the genus <em>Rosa</em> L. Taxon 25: 181.
  • Rubtsov, G. A. 1944. Geographical distribution of the genus <em>Pyrus</em> and trends and factors in its evolution. Amer. Naturalist 78: 358-66.
  • Rudnicky, J. L.; McDonnell, M. J. 1989. Forty-eight years of canopy change in a hardwood-hemlock forest in New York City. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 116: 52-64.
  • Ruehle, K. 1924. Beitrõge zur Kenntnis der Gattung <em>Prunus</em>. Bot. Arch. 8: 224-49.
  • Rybin, V. A. 1926. Cytological investigations of the genus <em>Malus</em> (preliminary account). Trudy Prikl. Bot. 16(3): 187-200. (Russian with English summary)
  • Rydberg, A. 1920. Notes on Rosaceae - XII. Roses of northeastern North America. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 47: 45-66.
  • Rydberg, A. 1908. Notes on Rosaceae- I. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 35: 535-42.
  • Rydberg, A. 1911. Notes on Rosaceae- V. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 38: 79-89.
  • Rydberg, P. A. 1915. Notes on Rosaceae- IX. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 42: 117-60.
  • Rydberg, P. A. 1897. Notes on <em>Potentilla</em> - VI. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 24: 1-13.
  • Rydberg, P. A. 1915. Notes on Rosaceae- X. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 42: 463-79.
  • Rydberg, P. A. 1923. <em>Rosa palustris</em>. Addisonia 8: 37-8.
  • Rydberg, P. A. 1898. A monograph of the North American Potentilleae.
  • Rydberg, P. A. 1905. Rosaceae. N. Amer. Fl. 22: 239-480. (1905-1913)
  • Salamun, P. J. 1951. A population study of the variation in the inflorescence of <em>Spiraea tomentosa</em>. Rhodora 53(636): 280-92.
  • Sallabanks, R. 1992. Fruit fate, frugivory, and fruit characteristics: a study of the hawthorn, <em>Crataegus monogyna</em> (Rosaceae). Oecologia 91: 296-304.
  • Sanzol, J.; Rallo, P.; Herrero, M. 2003. Asynchronous development of stigmatic receptivity in the pear (<em>Pyrus communis</em>; Rosaceae) flower. Amer. J. Bot. 90: 78-84.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1892. <em>Amelanchier</em>. Silva N. Am. 4: 125-32.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1923. Notes on North American trees. XI. New species of <em>Crataegus</em>. J. Arnold Arbor. 4: 99-107.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1909. American <em>Crataegi</em> in the Species Plantarum of Linnaeus. Rhodora 11: 181-3.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1890. <em>Pyrus arbutifolia</em>. Gard. & Forest 3: 416-7.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1922. Notes on North American trees. X. New species and varieties of <em>Crataegus</em>. J. Arnold Arbor. 3: 182-206.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1905. Recently recognized species of <em>Crataegus</em> in eastern Canada and New England, -VI. Rhodora 7: 162-4, 174-85, 192-219.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1901. Notes on <em>Crataegus</em> in the Champlain Valley. Rhodora 3: 19-31.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1903. Recently recognized species of <em>Crataegus</em> in eastern Canada and New England, -II-V. Rhodora 5: 108-18, 137-53, 159-68, 182-7.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1921. Notes on North American trees. IX. New species and varieties of <em>Crataegus</em>. J. Arnold Arbor. 3: 1-11.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1907. The genus <em>Crataegus</em> in North America. J. Bot. 45: 289-92.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1903. Recently recognized species of <em>Crataegus</em> in eastern Canada and New England. Rhodora 5: 52-66.
  • Sargent, C. S. 1925. Notes on <em>Crataegus-Crataegus padifolia</em> var. <em>incarnata</em>. J. Arnold Arbor. 6: 1-5.
  • Sax, H. J.; Sax, K. 1947. The cytogenetics of generic hybrids of <em>Sorbus</em>. J. Arnold Arbor. 28: 137-40.
  • Sax, K. 1936. Polyploidy and geographic distribution in <em>Spiraea</em>. J. Arnold Arbor. 17: 352-6.
  • Sax, K. 1931. The origin and relationships of the Pomoideae. J. Arnold Arbor. 12: 3-22.
  • Sax, K. 1933. The origin of the Pomoideae. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 30: 147-50.
  • Sax, K. 1959. The cytogenetics of facultative apomixis in <em>Malus</em> species. J. Arnold Arbor. 40: 289-97.
  • Schaeppi, H. 1978. Concerning the 'double ovary' of <em>Rhodotypos</em>. Beitr. Biol. Pflanzen 53(2): 165-75. (In German; English summary)
  • Schaeppi, H.; Frank, K. 1967. Vergleichend-morphologische Untersuchungen an der Blutenachse und am Gynoecum einiger Spiraeoideen (Spierstrauchgewochse). Mitt. Naturwiss. Ges. Winterhur 32: 73-104.
  • Schanzer, I. A. 1994. Taxonomic revision of the genus <em>Filipendula</em> Mill. (Rosaceae). Jap. J. Bot. 69: 290-319.
  • Schmid, F. C. 1958. Cedar waxwings and fox sparrows feed on multiflora rose. Wilson Bull. 70: 194-195.
  • Schneider, C. K. 1905. Uebersicht uber die spontanen Arten und Formen der Gattung <em>Spiraea</em> (<em>Euspiraea</em>). Bull. Herb. Boissier 5: 335-350. (In German)
  • Schneider, G. H. 1952. <em>Geum canadense</em>, a study of its seasonal periodicity in New Jersey. Castanea 17: 117-28.
  • Schroeder, F. G. 1968. Zur Nomenklatur in der Gattung <em>Amelanchier</em> (Rosaceae). Taxon 17: 633-4. (In German, English summary)
  • Scott, D. P.; Yahner, R. H. 1989. Winter habitat and browse use by snowshoe hares, <em>Lepus americanus</em>, in a marginal habitat in Pennsylvania. Canad. Field-Naturalist 103: 560-3.
  • Scott, T. G. 1955. Dietary patterns of red and gray foxes. Ecology 36: 366-7.
  • Seymour, F. C. 1973. The range of <em>Prunus americana</em> in New England. Phytologia 23(3): 97-9.
  • Shabel, A. B.; Peart, D. R. 1994. Effects of competition, herbivory and substrate disturbance on growth and size structure in pin cherry (<em>Prunus pensylvanica</em> L.) seedlings. Oecologia 98: 150-8.
  • Shafranova, L. M. 1968. The anatomical structure of shoots in <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em> L., <em>P. parvifolia</em> Fisch. and <em>P. bifurca</em> L., associated with the transformation of shrubs into herbs in <em>Potentilla</em> L. (s.l.). Bjull. Moskovsk. Obsc. Isp. Prir., Otd. Biol. 73: 140-54. (In Russian; English summary.)
  • Shahid, A. et.al. 2009. Selection of seeds of common native and non-native plants by granivorous rodents in the northeastern United States. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 162: 207-212.
  • Shaw, J. 1983. Gardening with species roses. Arnoldia (Jamaica Plain) 43: 2-16.
  • Shaw, J.; Small, R. L. 2005. Chloroplast DNA phylogeny and phylogeography of the North American plums (<em>Prunus</em> subgenus <em>Prunus</em> section <em>Prunocerasus</em>, Rosaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 92: 2011-2030.
  • Shaw, J.; Small, R. L. 2004. Addressing the "hardest puzzle in American pomology:"phylogeny of <em>Prunus</em> sect. <em>Prunocerasus</em> (Rosaceae) based on seven noncoding chloroplast DNA regions. Amer. J. Bot. 91: 985-996.
  • Shepherd, R. 1978. History of the rose. Coleman, New York.
  • Sherburne, J. A. 1972. Effects of seasonal changes in the abundance and chemistry of the fleshy fruits of northeastern woody shrubs on patterns of exploitation by frugivorous birds. Ph.D. Dissertation Cornell University, Ithaca, NY157 p.
  • Shiflett, S. A.; Young, D. R. 2010. Avian seed dispersal on Virginia barrier islands: potential influence on vegetation community structure and patch dynamics. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 164: 91-106.
  • Shinners, L. H. et.al. 1956. <em>Prunus americana</em> var. <em>lantana</em>, a synonym of <em>P. nigra</em>. Rhodora 58: 330-331.
  • Shoemaker, J. S. 1928. Cherry pollination studies.
  • Simini, M.; Skelly, J. M.; Davis, D. D.; Savage, J. E. 1992. Sensitivity of four hardwood species to ambient ozone in north central Pennsylvania. Canad. J. Forest Res. 22: 1789-99.
  • Sims, J. 1818. <em>Pyrus coronaria</em>. Sweet-scented crab-tree. Bot. Mag. 45: pl. 2009.
  • Sinnott, Q. P.; Phipps, J. B. 1983. Variation patterns in <em>Crataegus</em> series <em>Pruinosae</em> (Rosaceae) in Ontario. Syst. Bot. 81: 59-70.
  • Skibinskaia, A. M. 1966. Historical geography of the genus <em>Malus</em>. Bjulleten' Glavnogo botanicheskogo sada 61: 52-9. (In Russian)
  • Slade, B. 1957. Leaf development in relation to veination as shown in <em>Cercis siliquastrum</em> L., <em>Prunus serrulata</em> Lindl. and <em>Acer platanus</em>. New Phyt. 56: 281-300.
  • Small, E. 1976. Insect pollinators of the Mer Bleue peat bog of Ottawa. Canad. Field-Naturalist 90: 22-28.
  • Smedmark, J. E. E. 2006. Recircumscription of <em>Geum</em> (Colurieae: Rosaceae). Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 126: 409-417.
  • Smedmark, J. E. E.; Eriksson, T. 2006. Early stages of development shed light on fruit evolution in allopolyploid species of <em>Geum</em> (Rosaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 167: 791-803.
  • Smedmark, J. E. E.; Eriksson, T. 2002. Phylogenetic relationships of <em>Geum</em> (Rosaceae) and relatives inferred from nrITS and trnL-trnF regions. Syst. Bot. 27: 303-317.
  • Smith, A. J. 1975. Invasion and ecesis of bird-disseminated woody plants in a temperate forest sere. Ecology 56(1): 19-34.
  • Smith, L. L.; Vankat, J. L. 1991. Communities and tree seedling distribution in <em>Quercus rubra</em> and <em>Prunus serotina</em> dominated forests in southwestern Pennsylvania. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 126: 294-307.
  • Smith, P. G.; Phipps, J. B. 1988. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae, Maloideae): 15. Patterns of morphological variation in <em>Crataegus</em> series <em>Rotundifoliae</em> in Ontario. Syst. Bot. 13(1): 97-106.
  • Smith, P. G.; Phipps, J. B. 1988. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae, Maloideae): 19. Breeding behavior in Ontario <em>Crataegus</em> series <em>Rotundifoliae</em>. Canad. J. Bot. 66: 1914-23.
  • Smith, P. G.; Phipps, J. B. 1987. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae, Maloideae): 16. Taxonomy of <em>C.</em> series <em>Rotundifoliae</em> in Ontario. Canad. J. Bot. 65: 2646-67.
  • Smith, P. G.; Phipps, J. B.; Dickinson, T. A. 1980. Accumulated heat in relation to <em>Crataegus</em> flowering. (Abstract)
  • Snyder, D. 1990. A further note on the occurrence of <em>Geum vernum</em> in New Jersey. Bartonia 56: 67-8.
  • Snyder, S. A. 1992. <em>Amelanchier arborea</em>. ()
  • Sojak, J. 1987. Notes on <em>Potentilla</em>. IV. Classification of Wolk's group "Potentillae trichocarpae". Candollea 42: 491-500.
  • Sokolova, E. A. 1989. Importance of characters of anatomical petiole structure for the systematics of the genera <em>Cerasus</em> Mill. and <em>Padus</em> Mill. (Rosaceae). Sborn. Nauch. Tr. Prikl. Bot. Genet. Selek. 124: 109-12. (In Russian; English summary)
  • Southwick, E. E. et.al. 1981. Nectar production composition energetics and pollinator attractiveness in spring flowers of western New York USA. Amer. J. Bot. 68: 994-1002.
  • Sprague, T. A. 1929. The correct spelling of certain generic names. V. Kew Bull. 1929: 241-3.
  • Stafford, P. J. 1988. Evolution, systematics, and fossil history of the Hamamelidae.
  • Standish, L. M. 1916. What is happening to the hawthorns? J. Heredity 7: 266-79.
  • Staniforth, R. J.; Sidhu, S. S. 1984. Effects of atmospheric fluorides on foliage, flower, fruit, and seed production in wild raspberry and blueberry. Canad. J. Bot. 62: 2827-34.
  • Stapf, O. 1925. <em>Aronia melanocarpa</em>. Bot. Mag. 150: pl. 9052.
  • Starikova, V. V. 1975. Anatomo-morphol characteristics of nuts of <em>Rosa rugosa</em> Thunb. in the process of their development. Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Lenengrad) 60(4): 558-63. (In Russian)
  • Stearn, W. T. 1965. The five brethern of the rose: an old botanical riddle. Huntia 2: 180-4. (See footnote 9.)
  • Steele, F. L.; Hodgdon, A. R. 1970. Hybrids in <em>Rubus</em> subgenus <em>Eubatus</em> in New England. Rhodora 72: 240-50.
  • Steele, F.; Hodgdon, A. R. 1963. Hybridization of <em>Rubus hispidus</em> and <em>R. setosus</em>. Rhodora 65: 262-70.
  • Stephen, W. P. 1958. Pear pollination studies in Oregon.
  • Sterling, C. 1965. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae. V. Pomoideae: <em>Amelanchier, Aronia, Malacomeles, Malus, Peraphyllum, Pyrus, Sorbus</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 418-26.
  • Sterling, C. 1953. Developmental anatomy of the fruit of <em>Prunus domestica</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 80: 457-477. (Other genera also)
  • Sterling, C. 1965. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae VI. Pomoideae: <em>Eriobotrya, Heteromeles, Photinia, Pourthiaea, Raphiolepis, Stranvaesia</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 938-46.
  • Sterling, C. 1964. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae I. Prunoideae: <em>Prunus</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 51: 36-44.
  • Sterling, C. 1964. Comparative morphology of the carpel in the Rosaceae III. Pomoideae: <em>Crataegus, Hesperomeles, Mespilus, Osteomeles</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 51: 705-12.
  • Stewart, R. N.; Semeniuk, P. 1965. The effect of the interaction of temperature with after-ripening requirement and compensating temperature on germination of seed of five species of <em>Rosa</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 52: 755-60.
  • Stiles, E. W. 1982. Expansions of mockingbird and multiflora rose in the northeastern United States and Canada. Amer. Birds 36: 358-64.
  • Stoll, R. J. et.al. 1980. Foods of ruffed grouse <em>Bonasa umbellus</em> in Ohio USA. Ohio Fish Wildlife Rep. 1980: 1-18.
  • Stone, W. E. 1883. Fasciation in <em>Rubus</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 10: 48.
  • Sucoff, E.; Hong, S. G. 1976. Effect of NaCl on cold hardiness of <em>Malus</em> spp. and <em>Syringa vulgaris</em>. Canad. J. Bot. 54(24): 2816-9.
  • Sullivan, J. 1992. <em>Sorbus americana</em>. ()
  • Sutton, S. B. 1970. <em>Crataegus</em>: a thorny problem. In: Charles Sprague Sargent and the Arnold Arboretum. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA. , 279-98 pages.
  • Talent, N.; Dickinson, T. A. 2007. The potential for ploidy level increases and decreases in <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae, Spiraeoideae, tribe Pyreae). Canad. J. Bot. 85: 570-584.
  • Talent, N.; Dickinson, T. A. 2005. Polyploidy in <em>Crataegus</em> and <em>Mespilus</em> (Rosaceae, Maloideae): evolutionary inferences from flow cytometry of nuclear DNA amounts. Canad. J. Bot. 83: 1268-1304.
  • Taylor, K. 1997. <em>Geum rivale</em> L. J. Ecol. 85: 721-731.
  • Taylor, K. 1989. The absense of mycorrhiza in <em>Rubus chamaemorus</em>. Ann. Bot. Fenn. 26: 421-5.
  • Terpó, A. 1985. Studies on taxonomy and grouping of <em>Pyrus</em> species. Feddes Repert. 96(1-2): 73-87.
  • Thomas, P. T. 1940. Reproductive versatility in <em>Rubus</em>. II. The chromosomes and development. J. Genet. 40: 119-28.
  • Thomas, W. W.; Boufford, D. E. 1986. C.S. Sargents's <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae) types from western Pennsylvania. Brittonia 38: 27-31.
  • Thompson, M. M. 1997. Survey of chromosome numbers in <em>Rubus</em> (Rosaceae: Rosoideae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 84: 128-64.
  • Tippo, O. 1938. Comparative anatomy of the Moraceae and their presumed allies. Bot. Gaz. 100: 1-99.
  • Tirmenstein, D. A. 1989. <em>Rubus laciniatus</em>. ()
  • Tirmenstein, D. A. 1989. <em>Rubus idaeus</em>. ()
  • Topham, P. B. 1967. Fertility in crosses involving diploid and autotetraploid raspberries. I. The embryo & II. Fruit and seed development. Ann. Bot. 31: 673-97.
  • Torrey, R. H. 1930. <em>Potentilla</em> (<em>Sibbaldiopsis</em>) <em>tridentata</em> survives on High Point. Torreya 30: 99.
  • Traux, B.; Gagnon, D.; Lambert, F.; Chevrier, N. 1994. Nitrate assimilation of raspberry and pin cherry in a recent clearcut. Canad. J. Bot. 72(9): 1343-8.
  • Tufts, W. P.; Philip, G. L. 1925. Pollination of the sweet cherry.
  • Tukey, H. B. 1934. Growth of the embryo, seed, and pericarp of the sour cherry (<em>Prunus cerasus</em>) in relation to season of fruit ripening. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 31: 125-44.
  • Tukey, H. B. 1935. Growth of the embryo, seed, and pericarp of the sour cherry (<em>Prunus cerasus</em>) in relation to season of fruit ripening. Proc. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 31: 125-44.
  • Tukey, H. B. 1922. A case of pistillody and staminoidy in the plum. Torreya 22: 28-9.
  • Tukey, H. B.; Young, J. O. 1939. Histological study of the developing fruit of the sour cherry. Bot. Gaz. 100: 723-49.
  • Tukey, H. B.; Young, J. O. 1942. Gross morphology and histology of developing fruit of the apple. Bot. Gaz. 104: 3-25.
  • Tukey, L. D. 1959. Periodicity in growth of fruits of apples, peaches, and sour cherries with some factors influencing their development.
  • Turland, N. 1996. Proposal to reject the name <em>Rosa eglanteria</em>(Rosaceae). Taxon 45(3): 565-6.
  • Turrill, W. B. 1964. <em>Physocarpus opulifolius</em> f. <em>luteus</em>. Bot. Mag. 175: pl. 459.
  • Tuz, A. S. 1972. Up-to-date systematics of the genus <em>Pyrus</em> L. Trudy Prikl. Bot. 46: 70-91. (In Russian; English summary)
  • Tweedy, F. 1880. <em>Salix</em> and <em>Rubus</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 7: 56.
  • Uchytil, R. J. 1991. <em>Prunus serotina</em>. ()
  • Ulf-Hansen, P. F. 1988. An examination of large-scale population changes in eastern North American hawthorns. M.S. Thesis Univ. Western Ontario, London, Ontario,
  • Uttal, L. J. 1984. Nomenclatural changes, lectotypification and comments in <em>Aronia</em> Medikus (Rosaceae). Sida 10(3): 199-202.
  • Uttal, L. J. 1974. The varieties of <em>Spiraea betulifolia</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 101: 35-6.
  • Uttal, L. J. 1973. An infraspecific nomenclatorial correction in <em>Spiraea</em>. Castanea 38(2): 205.
  • Uva, R. H. 2003. Growth and yield of beach plum (<em>Prunus maritima</em> Marshall) in horticultural, land restoration, and ecological systems. Ph.D. Dissertation Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY,
  • Uva, R. H. 2004. Taming the wild beach plum. Arnoldia (Jamaica Plain) 62: 11-19.
  • Uva, R. H.; Whitlow, T. H. 2005. Beach plum: a shrub for low-maintenance landscapes. Arnoldia (Jamaica Plain) 63: 19-20. (Prunus maritima 'Ocean View')
  • Uwate, W. J.; Lin, J. 1981. Development of the stigmatic surface of <em>Prunus avium</em> L., sweet cherry. Amer. J. Bot. 68(9): 1165-76.
  • Vaitkus, M. R. et al. et.al. 1993. Growth and photosythesis of seedlings of five bottomland tree species following nutrient enrichment. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 129: 42-51.
  • Vamosi, J. C.; Dickinson, T. A. 2006. Polyploidy and diversification: a phylogenetic investigation in Rosaceae. Int. J. Plant Sci. 167: 349-358.
  • Van De Laar, H. J. 1982. <em>Potentilla fruticosa</em>. Dendroflora 19: 29-43.
  • Vas'kovskii, V. E.; Gorovoi, P. G. 1996. The enzyme phospholipase D in the Rosaceae and Fabaceae leaves. Bot. Zhurn. (Moscow & Lenengrad) 81: 85-90. (In Russian; English summary)
  • Vasilakakis, M.; Porlingis, I. C. 1985. Effect of temperature on pollen germination, pollen tube growth, effective pollination period and fruit set of pear. Hortscience 20: 733-5.
  • Vetvicka, V. 1972. Diagnostic and taxonomic importance of sepals in the genus <em>Rosa</em> L.: 1&2. Cas. Slezsk. Muz., C, Dendrol. 2: 105-28. (In Chech?)
  • Vidal, J. 1963. Le genre <em>Neillia</em> (Rosaceae). Adansonia 3: 142-66. (In French; Includes Physocarpus)
  • Vincent, M. A. 2005. On the spread and current distribution of <em>Pyrus calleryana</em> in the United States. Castanea 70: 20-31.
  • Visser, T. 1956. The growth of apple seedlings as affected by after-ripening, seed maturity and light. Proc. Nederl. Akad. Wet. C. 59: 325-34.
  • Visser, T. 1954. After-ripening and germination of apple seeds in relation to the seed coats. Proc. Nederl. Akad. Wet. C. 57: 175-85.
  • Visser, T. 1956. Some observations on respiration and secondary dormancy in apple seeds. Proc. Nederl. Akad. Wet. C. 59: 314-24.
  • Visser, T. 1956. The role of seed coats and temperature in after-ripening, germination and respiration of apple seeds. Proc. Nederl. Akad. Wet. C. 59: 211-22.
  • Von Abrams, G. J.; Hand, N. E. 1956. Seed dormancy in <em>Rosa</em> as a function of climate. Amer. J. Bot. 43: 7-12.
  • Voss, E. G. 1965. A review on <em>Crataegus</em>. Michigan Bot. 4: 93-6.
  • Waldbauer, G. P. 1984. Mating behavior at blossoms and the flower associations of mimetic <em>Temnostoma</em> spp. Diptera Syrphidae in northern Michigan USA. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Wash. 86: 295-304.
  • Waldron, G. E.; Hilton, R. J.; Ambrose, J. D. 1976. Evidence of microevolution in an escaped pear population. Canad. J. Bot. 54(24): 2857-67.
  • Wanscher, J. H. 1939. Contributions to the cytology and life history of apple and pear. Vet. & Agr. Coll. Copenhagen Yearb. 1939: 21-70.
  • Watson, S. 1885. Contributions to American botany. 1. A history and revision of the roses of North America. Proc. American Acad. Arts 20: 324-52.
  • Waugh, F. A. 1899. The pollination of plums. Vermont Agric. Exp. Sta. Annual Rep. 12: 189-209.
  • Waugh, R.; van de Ven, W. T. G.; Phillips, M. S.; Powell, W. 1990. Chloroplast DNA diversity in the genus <em>Rubus</em> (Rosaceae) revealed by Southern hybridization. Pl. Syst. Evol. 172: 65-75.
  • Weakley, A. S.; Gandhi, K. N. 2008. Recognition of three taxa of eastern North American "<em>Waldsteinia</em>" and their appropriate names when incorporated into <em>Geum</em> (Colurieae: Rosaceae). J. Bot. Res. Inst. Texas 2: 415-418.
  • Weatherby, C. A. 1916. Staminoidy of the petals in <em>Amelanchier</em>. Rhodora 18(206): 48-9.
  • Weaver, R. E. 1974. The shadbushes. Arnoldia (Jamaica Plain) 34: 22-31.
  • Weaver, R. E. 1980. Outstanding plants of the Arnold Arboretum: <em>Amelanchier arborea</em>. Arnoldia (Jamaica Plain) 40(2): 94-7.
  • Webb, J. E. 1901. A morphological study of the flower and embryo of <em>Spiraea</em>. Bot. Gaz. 33: 451-60. (Astilbe & Aruncus misidentified along with 1 Spiraea)
  • Webb, S. L.; Willson, M. F. 1985. Spatial heterogenity in post-dispersal predation in <em>Prunus</em> and <em>Uvularia</em> seeds. Oecologia 67: 150-3.
  • Weber, C. 1964. The genus <em>Chaenomeles</em> (Rosaceae). J. Arnold Arbor. 45: 161-295, 302-45.
  • Weber, H. E. 1985. On the nomenclature and distribution of taxa in the genus <em>Rubus</em> L. (Rosaceae) described by K.E.A. Weihe. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 106: 289-335. (In German; English summary)
  • Weber, J. E.; Campbell, C. S. 1989. Breeding system of a hybrid between a sexual and an apomictic species of <em>Amelanchier</em>, shadbush (Rosaceae, Maloideae). Amer. J. Bot. 76(3): 341-7.
  • Webster, A. D. (eds.) (1995): 1995. Cherries: crop physiology, production and uses. CABI. , 464 pages. (ISBN 0851989365)
  • Weerdenburg, C. A.; Peterson, C. A. 1983. Structural changes in phi thickenings during primary and secondary growth in roots. I. Apple (<em>Pyrus malus</em>) Rosaceae. Canad. J. Bot. 61: 2570-6.
  • Weiss, H. B.; West, E. 1924. Insects and plants of a dry woods in the pine barrens of New Jersey. Ecology 5: 241-53.
  • Wells, T. C. 1985. An analysis of interserial hybrids in <em>Crataegus</em>. M.S. Thesis Univ. Western Ontario, London, Ontario,
  • Wells, T. C.; Phipps, J. B. 1989. Studies in <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae: Maloideae): 20. Interserial hybridization between <em>Crateagus monogyna</em> (series Oxycanthae) and <em>Crataegus punctata</em> (series Punctatae) in southern Ontario. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 2465-72. (French summary)
  • Wen, J. et.al. 2008. Phylogenetic inferences in <em>Prunus</em> (Rosaceae) using chloroplast ndhF and nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. J. Systematics Evol. 46: 322-332.
  • Wendel, G. W. 1972. Longevity of black cherry seed in the forest floor.
  • Werger, J.; Burton, R. E. 1972. Roses: a bibliography of botanical, horticultural and other works related to the genus <em>Rosa</em>. Scarecrow Press, Metuchen. , 169 pages.
  • Weryszko-Chmielewska, E. et.al. 2003. Characteristics of floral nectaries and nectar in two species of <em>Crataegus</em> (Rosaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 238: 33-41.
  • Westwood, M. N.; Bjornstad, H. I. 1971. Some fruit characteristics of interspecific hybrids and extent of self-fertility in <em>Pyrus</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 98: 22-4.
  • Westwood, M. N.; Bjornstad, H. O. 1971. Some fruit characteristics of interspecific hybrids and extent of self-sterility in <em>Pyrus</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 98: 22-4.
  • Whelan, C. J.; Willson, M. F.; Tuma, C. A.; Souza-Pinto, I. 1991. Spatial and temporal patterns of postdispersal seed predation. Canad. J. Bot. 69(2): 428-36.
  • Whiteley, A. 1996. <em>Rosa canina</em>: the dog rose and its garden derivatives. New Plantsman 3(3): 131-3.
  • Whitney, G. G. 1986. A demographic analysis of <em>Rubus idaeus</em> and <em>Rubus pubescens</em>. Canad. J. Bot. 64: 2916-21.
  • Whitney, G. G. 1978. A demographic analysis of <em>Rubus idaeus</em> L. and <em>Rubus pubescens</em> Raf.: The reproductive traits and population dynamics of two temporally isolated members of the genus <em>Rubus</em>. Ph.D. Thesis Yale University, New Haven, CT,
  • Whitney, G. G. 1984. The reproductive biology of raspberries and plant-pollinator community structure. Amer. J. Bot. 71: 887-894. (Also Prunus, Uvularia)
  • Whitney, G. G. 1982. The productivity and carbohydrate economy of a developing stand of <em>Rubus idaeus</em>. Canad. J. Bot. 60: 2697-703.
  • Widrlechner, Mark P. 1998. The Genus <em>Rubus</em> L. in Iowa. Castanea 63(4): 415-465.
  • Wiegand, K. M. 1912. The genus <em>Amelanchier</em> in eastern North America. Rhodora 14: 117-161. (see <em>ibid</em>. 239-241. and <em>ibid</em>. 22:146-151. 1920.)
  • Wiegand, K. M. 1935. A taxonomist's experience with hybrids in the wild. Science 81: 161-6.
  • Wiegand, K. M. 1900. Some varieties of <em>Potamogeton</em> and <em>Spiraea</em>. Rhodora 2: 102-4.
  • Wiegand, K. M. 1921. <em>Amelanchier amabilis</em>, a new name. Rhodora 23(266): 48.
  • Wiegand, K. M. 1920. Additional notes on <em>Amelanchier</em>. Rhodora 22(260): 146-51.
  • Wight, W. F. 1915. Native American species of <em>Prunus</em>.
  • Williams, A. H. 1982. Chemical evidence from the flavonoids relevant to the classification of <em>Malus</em> species. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 84(1): 31-9.
  • Williams, I. H. 1959. Effects of environment on <em>Rubus idaeus</em> L. II. Field observations on the variety Malling Promise. J. Hort. Sci. 34: 170-5.
  • Wissemann, V.; Hellwig, F. H. 1997. Reproduction and hybridisation in the genus <em>Rosa</em> section <em>Caninae</em> (Ser.) Rehd. Botanica Acta 110: 251-256.
  • Wissemann, V.; Ritz, C. M. 2005. The genus <em>Rosa</em> (Rosoideae, Rosaceae) revisited: molecular analysis of nrITS-1 and atpB-rbcL intergenic spacer (IGS) versus conventional taxonomy. Bot. J. Linn. Soc. 147: 275-290.
  • Wissemann, V.; Ritz, C. M. 2007. Evolutionary patterns and processes in the genus <em>Rosa</em> (Rosaceae) and their implications for host-parasite co-evolution. Pl. Syst. Evol. 266: 79-89.
  • Wolf, T. 1908. Monographie der Gattung <em>Potentilla</em>. Biblioth. Bot. 16: 1-715. (In German)
  • Wolfe, L. P.; Hodgdon, A. R. 1951. A new form of <em>Rubus allegheniensis</em>. Rhodora 53(625): 30-2.
  • Woodcock, E. F.; Tullis, E. C. 1928. Extra-floral nectar glands of <em>Malus malus</em> and <em>Pyrus communis</em>. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci. 8: 239-43.
  • Wright, D. 1981. <em>Sorbus</em>: a gardener's evaluation. The Plantsman 3(2): 65-98.
  • Wright, P. H. 1973. Amelanchiers. Horticulture (Boston) 51: 62-3, 70.
  • Wronska-Pilarek, D.; Jagodzinski, A. M. 2011. Systematic importance of pollen morphological features of selected species from the genus <em>Rosa</em> (Rosaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 295: 55-72.
  • Yarnell, S. H. 1936. Chromosome behavior in blackberry-raspberry hybrids. J. Agric. Res. 52: 385-95.
  • Yerger, R. W. 1955. Life history notes on the eastern chipmunk, <em>Tamias striatus lysteri</em> (Richardson) in central New York. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 53: 312-23.
  • Young, H. W. 1872. Suffolk County plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 3:51-52 (1872); 4:41 (1873)
  • Young, S. 1999. More plants of the rare Nantucket juneberry discovered. New York Flora Association Newsletter 10: 3.
  • Yü, T. T. 1984. Origin and evolution of Rosaceae. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 22(6): 431-44. (In Chinese; English summary)
  • Zeller, O. 1975. Contribution to the floral morphogenesis of <em>Rosa canina</em> L., <em>Rosa rubiginosa</em> L., <em>Rosa virginiana</em> Mill. and cultivar Super Star (Tantau 1960). Gartenbauwissenschaft 40(6): 276-84. (In German; English, French, & Russian summaries)
  • Zhang, S. Y.; Baas, P.; Zandee, M. 1992. Wood structure of the Rosaceae in relation to ecology, habit and phenology. IAWA Bull. 13(3): 307-49.
  • Zielinski, J. 1985. Studies on the genus <em>Rosa</em> L.: systematics of section <em>Caninae</em> DC. em. Christ. Arbor. Kornickie 30: 3-109. (In Polish; English and Russian summaries)
  • Zielinski, J. et.al. 2010. Stomata on the pericarp of species of the genus <em>Rosa</em> L. (Rosaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 284: 49-55.
  • Zielinski, Q. B. 1965. Self incompatability of <em>Pyrus</em> species. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 92: 219-20.
  • Zielinski, Q. B.; Thompson, M. M. 1966. Pollen germination in <em>Pyrus</em> species and species hybrids. Euphytica 15: 195-8.
  • Zielinski, Q. B.; Thompson, M. M. 1967. Speciation in <em>Pyrus</em>: Chromosome number and meiotic behavior. Bot. Gaz. 128(2): 109-12.
  • Zika, P. F. 2003. Notes on the provenance of some eastern wetland species disjunct in western North America. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 130: 43-46.
  • Zimmermann, M. H.; Jeje, A. A. 1981. Vessel-length distribution in stems of some American woody plants. Canad. J. Bot. 59: 1882-1892.