New York Metropolitan Flora

Family: Anacardiaceae

Toxicodendron radicans

By Susan Pell

Not peer reviewed

Last Modified 01/25/2013

Nomenclature

List of Anacardiaceae Genera

References to Anacardiaceae

  • Anderson, T. E. 1995. The poison ivy, oak & sumac book: a short natural history and cautionary account. Acton Circle, Ukiah, CA. , 130 pages.
  • Anonymous 1880. Adventitious leaves in <em>Rhus</em> Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 7: 91.
  • Anonymous 1875. Climbing plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 6: 47.
  • Anonymous 1974. <em>Rhus glabra</em> L.: Smooth sumac, scarlet sumac, member of the family Anacardiaceae. Davidsonia 5(3): 32-4.
  • Baer, H. 1979. The poisonous Anacardiaceae. In: Toxic plants. Columbia Univ. Press, New York. , 161-70 pages.
  • Barkley, F. A. 1940. <em>Schmaltzia</em>. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 24: 647-65.
  • Barkley, F. A. 1940. Studies in the Anacardiaceae--V. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 24: 680.
  • Barkley, F. A. 1937. Studies in the Anacardiaceae I-II. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 24: 263-4.
  • Barkley, F. A. 1965. A criticism of the traditional concept of the genus <em>Rhus</em>. Prospects of Iraq Biology 3: 52-58.
  • Barkley, F. A. 1942. A key to the genera of the Anacardiaceae. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 28: 465-74.
  • Barkley, F. A. 1957. Generic key to the sumac family (Anacardiaceae). Lloydia 20: 255-65.
  • Barkley, F. A. 1937. A monographic study of <em>Rhus</em> and its immediate allies in North and Central America, including the West Indies. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 24: 265-498.
  • Barkley, F. A. 1938. Studies in the Anacardiaceae. III. A note concerning the status of <em>Rhus pulvinata</em> Greene (<em>R. glabra</em> x <em>typhina</em> Koehne). Amer. Midl. Naturalist 19: 598-600.
  • Barkley, F. A. 1937. A monographic study of <em>Rhus</em> and its immediate allies in North and Central America, including West Indies. Missouri Bot. Gard. Bull. 24: 265-498.
  • Barkley, F. A.; Barkley, E. D. 1938. A short history of <em>Rhus</em> to the time of Linnaeus. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 19: 265-333.
  • Bogacinski, B.; Molski, B. 1969. Morphology and anatomy of the sumac fruit - <em>Rhus typhina</em> L., Tourn. Roczn. Dendrol. 23: 165-183. (In Polish; English summary)
  • Boyd, I. L. 1943. Germination tests on four species of sumac. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 46: 85-6.
  • Boyd, I. L. 1944. An ecological study of four species of sumac in relation to development and growth on eroded soil. Trans. Kansas Acad. Sci. 47: 51-59.
  • Brizicky, George K. 1963. Taxonomic and nomenclatural notes on the genus <em>Rhus</em> (Anacardiaceae). J. Arnold Arbor. 44: 60-80.
  • Brizicky, George K. 1962. The genera of Anacardiaceae in the Southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 43: 359-75.
  • Campbell, T. A. 1984. Agronomic and chemical evaluation of smooth sumac, <em>Rhus glabra</em>. Econ. Bot. 38(2): 218-23.
  • Carpenter, S. B.; Smith, N. D. 1981. A comparative study of leaf thickness among southern Appalachian hardwoods. Canad. J. Bot. 59: 1393-6.
  • Carpenter, S. B.; Smith, N. D. 1975. Stomatal distribution and size in southern Appalachian hardwoods. Canad. J. Bot. 53: 1153-6.
  • Carr, M. E.; Roth, W. B.; Bagby, M. O. 1986. Potential resource materials from Ohio plants. Econ. Bot. 40(4): 434-41.
  • Carter, G. A.; Teramura, A. H.; Forseth, I. N. 1989. Photosynthesis in an open field for exotic versus native vines of the southeastern United States. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 443-6. (French summary)
  • Chung, J. C.; Waller, D. M. 1986. Patterns of insect predation on seeds of smooth sumac (<em>Rhus glabra</em> L.). Amer. Midl. Naturalist 116: 315-22.
  • Clarke, I. D.; Rogers, J. S.; Sievers, A. F.; Hopp, H. 1949. Tannin content and other characteristics of native sumac in relation to its value as a commercial source of tannin.
  • Clausen, Robert T. 1941. Northeastern limits of the known range of <em>Rhus toxicodendron</em>. Torreya 41: 58-9.
  • Cody, W. J. 1982. A comparison of the northern limits of distribution of some vascular plant species found in southern Ontario. Naturaliste Canad. 109: 63-90.
  • Coladoanto, M. 1992. <em>Rhus copallina</em>. ()
  • Crooks, D. M.; Klingman, D. L. 1971. Poison-ivy, poison-oak, and poison sumac: identification, precautions, eradication. U.S.D.A. Farmers Bull. 1972: 1-30.
  • Davidar, P.; Morton, E. S. 1986. The relationship between fruit crop sizes and fruit removal rates by birds. Ecology 67: 262-5.
  • Davis, W. T. 1886. Fasciation in <em>Ailanthus</em> and Sumach. Proc. Nat. Sci. Assoc. Staten Island December, 1986
  • Dirr, M. A. 1978. Tolerance of seven woody ornamentals to soil-applied sodium chloride. J. Arboric. 4(7): 162-5.
  • Dolan, R. W. 1994. Effects of proscribed burn on tree- and herb-layer vegetation in a post oak (<em>Quercus stellata</em>) dominated flatwoods. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 103: 25-32.
  • Doorenbos, N. J.; Box, C. O. 1976. Cultivation of <em>Rhus glabra</em> L. and <em>Rhus copallina</em> L. J. Mississippi Acad. Sci. 21: 55-7.
  • Doust, J. L.; Doust, L. L. 1988. Modules of production and reproduction in a dioecious clonal shrub, <em>Rhus typhina</em>. Ecology 69: 741-50.
  • Engler, A. 1881. Uber die morphologischen Verholtnisse und die geographische Verbreitung der Gattung <em>Rhus</em>, wie der mit ihr verwandten, lebenden und ausgestrobenen Anacardiaceae. Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 1: 365-426. (In German)
  • Farmer, R. E.; Lockley, G. C.; Cunningham, M. 1982. Germination patterns of the sumacs, <em>Rhus glabra</em> and <em>R. copallina</em>: effects of scarification time, temperature and genotype. Seed Sci. Tech. 10: 223-231.
  • Fogg, J. M. Jr. 1966. The silent travelers. Brooklyn Bot. Gard. Rec. 22: 4-7. (New Series)
  • Foster, B. L.; Gross, K. L. 1999. Temporal and spatial patterns of woody plant establishment in Michigan old fields. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 142: 229-243.
  • Frankel, E. 1991. Poison ivy, poison oak, poison sumac, and their relatives. The Boxwood Press, Pacific Grove, CA. , 98 pages. (For review see Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 120(1):76. 1993.)
  • Freeman, D. C. et.al. 2004. Photosynthesis and fluctuating asymmetry as indicators of plant response to soil disturbance in the fall-line sandhills of Georgia: a case study using <em>Rhus copallinum</em> and <em>Ipomoea pandurata</em>. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165: 805-816.
  • Freeman, D. C. et.al. 2004. Developmental instability in <em>Rhus copallinum</em> L.: multiple stressors, years, and responses. Int. J. Plant Sci. 165: 53-63.
  • Gadek, P. A. et al. et.al. 1996. Sapindales: Molecular delimitation and infraordinal groups. Amer. J. Bot. 83(6): 802-11.
  • Gallant, J. B.; Kemp, J. R.; Lacroix, C. R. 1998. Floral development of dioecious staghorn sumac, <em>Rhus hirta</em> (Anacardiaceae). Int. J. Plant Sci. 159: 539-549.
  • Gilbert, E. F. 1966. Structure and development of sumac clones. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 75: 432-45. (see also Larch & Sakai in Mich. Bot. 22: 3-9, 1983)
  • Gilbert, E. F. 1961. Phenology of sumacs. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 66: 286-300.
  • Gillis, W. T. 1961. Poison-ivy and the poison-oaks. Bull. Cranbrook Inst. Sci. 30: 98-107.
  • Gillis, W. T. 1975. Poison ivy and its kin. Arnoldia (Jamaica Plain) 35: 93-123.
  • Gillis, W. T. 1960. Taxonomic problems in poison ivy. Pap. Michigan Acad. Sci. 45: 27-34.
  • Gillis, W. T. 1971. The systematics and ecology of poison-ivy and the poison-oaks (<em>Toxicodendron</em>, Anacardiaceae). Rhodora 73: 72-159; 161-237; 370-443; 465-540.
  • Gillis, W. T. 1962. Poison-ivy in northern Michigan. Michigan Bot. 1: 17-22.
  • Glenn, Steven D. 1996. <em>Bombus</em> sp. visiting flowers of <em>Toxicodendron radicans</em>.
  • Glenn, Steven D. 1995. Honeybees (<em>Apis</em>) and bumblebees (<em>Bombus</em>) visiting <em>Rhus glabra</em> L. flowers.
  • Gorchov, D. L. 1987. Sequence of fruit ripening in bird-dispersed plants: consistency among years. Ecology 68: 223-5.
  • Graber, J. W.; Bowers, P. M. 1981. Dwarf sumac as winter bird food. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 105: 410-2.
  • Greene, E. 1905. Segregates of the genus <em>Rhus</em>. Leafl. Bot. Observ. Crit. 1: 114-44.
  • Greene, E. 1906. A study of <em>Rhus glabra</em>. Proc. Wash. Acad. Sci. 8: 167-96.
  • Grime, J. P.; Jeffrey, D. W. 1965. Seedling establishment in vertical gradients of sunlight. J. Ecol. 53(3): 621-42.
  • Gross, M.; Baer, H.; Fales, H. M. 1975. Urushiols of poisonous Anacardiaceae. Phytochemistry 14: 2263-2266.
  • Hall, B. A. 1947. The floral anatomy of the Aceraceae and some related families. Ph.D. Dissertation Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY25 plates + 82 p.
  • Hardin, J. W.; Phillips, L. L. 1985. Hybridization in eastern North American <em>Rhus</em> (Anacardiaceae). ASB Bull. 32(3): 99-106.
  • Hardin, J. W.; Phillips, L. L. 1985. Atlas of foliar surface features in woody plants, VII.<em>Rhus</em> subg. <em>Rhus</em> (Anacardiaceae) of North America. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 112: 1-10.
  • Heimsch, C. Jr. 1940. Wood anatomy and pollen morphology of <em>Rhus</em> and allied genera. J. Arnold Arbor. 21: 279-91.
  • Heit, C. E. 1968. Thirty-five years' testing of tree and shrub seed. J. Forest. 66(8): 632-3.
  • Hill, N. M. 1989. <em>Toxicodendron vernix</em> added to the flora of Nova Scotia. Rhodora 91: 242-3.
  • Hitchcock, A. S. 1893. The opening of the buds of some woody plants. Trans. St. Louis Acad. Sci. 6(5): 133-41.
  • Hoppes, W. G. 1988. Seedfall pattern of several species of bird-dispersed plants in an Illinois woodland. Ecology 69: 320-329.
  • Hoyt, S. F. 1957. Ecology of the pileated woodpecker. Ecology 38: 246-56.
  • Huebner, C. D.; Randolph, J. C.; Parker, G. R. 1995. Environmental factors affecting understory diversity in second-growth deciduous forests. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 134: 155-65.
  • Hussey, J. S. 1974. Some useful plants of early New England. Econ. Bot. 28(3): 311-37.
  • Ibe, R. A.; Leis, R. A. 1979. Pollen morphology of the Anacardiaceae of northeastern North America. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 106: 140-4.
  • Jaquish, L. L.; Ewers, F. W. 2001. Seasonal conductivity and embolism in the roots and stems of two clonal ring-porous trees, <em>Sassafras albidum</em> (Lauraceae) and <em>Rhus typhina</em> (Anacardiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 88: 206-212.
  • Jeune, B. 1987. Morphogen├×se foliaire du <em>Rhus typhina</em> L. (Anacardiaceae). Bull. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat., B, Adansonia 9: 445-57. (In French)
  • Johnson, R. A.; Willson, M. F.; Thompson, J. N.; Bertin, R. I. 1985. Nutritional values of wild fruits and consumption by migrant frugivorous birds. Ecology 66: 819-27.
  • Kartesz, J. T.; Gandhi, K. N. 1991. Nomenclatural notes on North American flora. Phytologia 71: 87-100.
  • Kingsbury, J. M. 1966. Poison ivy, poison sumac and other rash-producing plants. Cornell Extension Bulletin 1154: 1-16.
  • Kligman, A. M. 1958. Poison Ivy (<em>Rhus</em>) dermatitis. AMA Arch. Derm. Syph. 77: 149-80.
  • Koller, G. L.; Shadow, D. O. 1984. In praise of the american smoke tree. Arnoldia (Jamaica Plain) 44: 17-22.
  • Kozlowski, T. T. 1980. Responses of shade trees to pollution. J. Arboric. 6: 29-40. (Sulphur dioxide & ozone)
  • Krefting, L. W.; Roe, E. I. 1949. The role of some birds and mammals in seed germination. Ecol. Monogr. 19: 269-286.
  • Kryn, J. M. 1952. The anatomy of the wood of the Anacardiaceae and its bearing on the phylogeny and relationships of the family. Ph.D. Dissertation Univ. Michigan, Ann Arbor,
  • Kryn, J. M. 1953. The anatomy of the wood of the Anacardiaceae and its bearing on the phylogeny and relationships of the family. Diss. Abstr. 13: 290.
  • Kujawski, J. 2001. Propagation protocol for poison sumac (<em>Toxicodendron vernix</em>). Native Plants J. 2: 112-113.
  • Ladwig, L. M.; Meiners, S. J. 2010. Liana host preference and implications for deciduous forest regeneration. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 137: 103-112.
  • Larch, C. M.; Sakal, A. K. 1983. Successional and clonal changes at sites of smooth sumac (<em>Rhus glabra</em>). Michigan Bot. 22: 3-9.
  • Lavoie, C.; Jean, M.; Bouchard, A. 1991. Habitat su Sumac a vernis, <em>Rhus vernix</em>, a sa limite nord de distribution (Haut-Saint-Laurent, Quebec). Canad. Field-Naturalist 105: 71-7. (In French, English summary. Also Acer & Alnus)
  • Lawrey, J. D. 1977. Trace metal accumulation by plant species from a coal strip-mining area in Ohio. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 104: 368-375.
  • Li, X 1999. Comparative seed biology of several North American <em>Rhus</em> species (Anacardiaceae). Ph.D. Dissertation Univ. Kentucky, Lexington,
  • Li, X; Baskin, J. M.; Baskin, C. C. 1999. Anatomy of two mechanisms of breaking physical dormancy by experimental treatments in seeds of two North American <em>Rhus</em> species (Anacardiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 86: 1505-1511.
  • Li, X; Baskin, J. M.; Baskin, C. C. 1999. Comparative morphology and physiology of fruit and seed development in the two shrubs <em>Rhus aromatica</em> and <em>R. glabra</em> (Anacardiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 86: 1217-1225.
  • Li, X; Baskin, J. M.; Baskin, C. C. 1999. Contrasting soil seed-bank dynamics in relation to local recruitment modes in two clonal shrubs, <em>Rhus aromatica</em> Ait. And <em>R. glabra</em> L. (Anacardiaceae). Amer. Midl. Naturalist 142: 266-280.
  • Li, X; Baskin, J. M.; Baskin, C. C. 1999. Pericarp ontogeny and anatomy in <em>Rhus aromatica</em> Ait. and <em>R. glabra</em> L. (Anacardiaceae). J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 126: 279-288.
  • Little, E. L. 1945. Miscellaneous notes on nomenclature of United States trees. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 33: 495-513.
  • Lockwood, S. 1876. <em>Rhus toxicodenron</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 6: 79.
  • Lovell, J. F. 1964. An ecological study of <em>Rhus glabra</em>. Ph.D. Dissertation Kansas St. Univ., Manhattan, KS,
  • Lovett Doust, J.; Lovett Doust, L. 1988. Modules of production and reproduction in a dioecious clonal shrub, <em>Rhus typhina</em>. Ecology 69: 741-50.
  • Luken, J. O. 1987. Interactions between seed production and vegetative growth in staghorn sumac, <em>Rhus typhina</em> L. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 114: 247-51.
  • Luken, J. O. 1990. Gradual and episodic changes in the structure of <em>Rhus typhina</em> clones. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 117: 221-5.
  • Lumis, G. P.; Hofstra, G.; Hall, R. 1973. Sensitivity of roadside trees and shrubs to aerial drift of deicing salt. Hortscience 8: 475-7.
  • Lumis, G. P.; Hofstra, G.; Hall, R. 1975. Salt damage to roadside plants. J. Arboric. 1(1): 14-6.
  • Magen, K. 1912. Beitroge zur vergleichenden Anatomie der Samenschalen einiger Familien aus der Englershen Reihe der Sapindales. Ph.D. Dissertation Universitat Zurich,
  • Marks, P. L. 1979. Apparent fire-stimulated germination of <em>Rhus typhina</em> seeds. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 106: 41-2.
  • McDonnell, M. J. 1986. Old field vegetation height and the dispersal pattern of bird-disseminated woody plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 113: 6-11.
  • McInteer, B. B. 1947. Soil preference of some plants as seen in Kentucky. Castanea 12: 1-8.
  • McMurray, N. E. 1988. <em>Toxicodendron rydbergii</em>. ()
  • McNair, J. B. 1925. The geographical distribution of poison sumac (<em>Rhus vernix</em> L.) in North America. Amer. J. Bot. 12: 393-7.
  • McNair, J. B. 1921. The transmission of <em>Rhus</em> poison from plant to person. Amer. J. Bot. 8: 238-50.
  • McNair, J. B. 1925. Taxonomy and range of poison ivy. Science 61: 589.
  • McNair, J. B. 1925. The taxonomy of poison ivy, with a note on the origin of the generic name. Publ. Field Mus. Nat. Hist. Bot. Ser. 4: 55-70.
  • McNair, J. B. 1925. The geographical distribution in North America of poison ivy (<em>Rhus toxicodendron</em>) and allies. Amer. J. Bot. 12: 338-50.
  • Mehrhoff, L. J. 1986. The Anacardiaceae of Connecticut. Newsletter Conn. Bot. Soc. 14(3): 3-7.
  • Miller, A. J. 1998. A phylogenetic analysis of <em>Rhus</em> and its close relatives (Anacardiaceae). MS Thesis Colorado State Univ., Fort Collins,
  • Miller, A. J.; Young, D. A.; Wen, J. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of <em>Rhus</em> (Anacardiaceae) based on ITS sequence data. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162: 1401-1407.
  • Mitich, L. W. 1995. Poison-ivy, poison-oak, poison sumac- the virulent weeds. Weed Technol. 9(3): 653-6.
  • Moore, A. H. 1909. Hairy-fruited variations of <em>Rhus toxicodendron</em>. Rhodora 11: 162-3.
  • Muenscher, W. C. 1930. Poison ivy and poison sumac. Cornell Extension Bulletin 191, Ithaca. , 11 pages.
  • Muenscher, W. C.; Kingsbury, J. M. 1964. Poison ivy and poison sumac. Cornell Ext. Bull. 191. Cornell Univ., Ithaca, NY. , 11 pages.
  • Mulligan, G. A. 1980. Poison-ivy, western poison oak, poison sumac. Agric. Canada 1699: 5-13.
  • Mulligan, G. A.; Junkins, B. E. 1979. The Biology of Canadian weeds. 23. <em>Rhus radicans</em> L. In: The Biology of Canadian weeds. Contributions 1-32. Biosystematics Research Institute, Ottawa. , 257-65 pages. (Publication 1693)
  • Myster, R. W.; Pickett, S. T. A. 1990. Initial conditions, history and successional pathways in ten contrasting old fields. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 124: 231-8.
  • Nash, G. V. 1916. <em>Rhus hirta dissecta</em>. Addisonia 1: 73-4.
  • Nesler, R. B.; Bailey, W. W. 1944. Sumac as a food for bob-white quail. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 31: 689-96.
  • Nestler, R. B.; Bailey, W. W. 1944. Sumac fruit as a food for bob-white quail. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 31: 689-96.
  • Nuzzo, V. A.; McClain, W.; Strole, T. 1996. Fire impact on groundlayer flora in a sand forest. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 136: 207-21.
  • Paratley, R. D. 1986. Vegetation-environment relations in a conifer swamp in central New York. J. Torrey Bot. Soc. 113: 357-371.
  • Pavek, D. S. 1992. <em>Toxicodendron radicans</em>. ()
  • Pell, S. K. 2004. Molecular systematics of the cashew family (Anacardiaceae). Ph.D. Thesis Louisiana State Univ., Baton Rouge, (193 pp.)
  • Penner, R. et.al. 1999. The dispersal of fruits and seeds of Poison-ivy, <em>Toxicodendron radicans</em>, by Ruffed Grouse, <em>Bonasa umbellus</em>, and squirrels, <em>Tamiasciurus hudsonicus</em> and <em>Sciurus carolinensis</em>. Canad. Field-Naturalist 113: 616-620.
  • Petersen, F. P.; Fairbrothers, D. E. 1985. A serotaxonomic appraisal of the "Amentiferae". Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 112: 43-52.
  • Peterson, C. J.; Facelli, J. M. 1992. Contrasting germination and seedling growth of <em>Betula alleghaniensis</em> and <em>Rhus typhina</em> subjected to various amounts and types of plant litter. Amer. J. Bot. 79: 1209-16.
  • Raymond, M. 1971. Le <em>Rhus vernix</em> dans le Quebec. Naturaliste Canad. 98: 733-4. (In French)
  • Rehder, A. A. 1907. Some new or little known forms of New England trees. Rhodora 9: 109-17.
  • Rehder, A. et al. et.al. 1935. Conservation of later generic homonyms. Kew Bull. 1935: 341-544.
  • Reveal, J. L. 1991. <em>Rhus hirta</em> (L.) Sudworth, a newly revived correct name for <em>Rhus typhina</em> L. Taxon 40: 489-92.
  • Reveal, J. L. 1990. Minor new combinations in <em>Toxicodendron</em> (Anacardiaceae). Phytologia 69(4): 275.
  • Reveal, J. L. 1991. Typification of six Philip Miller names of temperate North American <em>Toxocodendron</em> (Anacardiaceae) with proposals (999-1000) to reject <em>T. crenatum</em> and <em>T. volubile</em>. Taxon 40: 333-5.
  • Ricklefs, R. E.; Matthew, K. K. 1982. Chemical characteristics of the foliage of some deciduous trees in southeastern Ontario. Canad. J. Bot. 60: 2037-45.
  • Robertson, C. 1896. Flowers and insects. XVII. Bot. Gaz. 22: 154-65.
  • Robinson, B. L. 1908. Notes on the vascular plants of the northeastern United States. Rhodora 10: 29-35.
  • S, J. T. S. 1872. <em>Rhus toxicodendron</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 3: 8.
  • Sando, C. E.; Bartlett, H. H. 1918. The flavones of <em>Rhus</em>. Amer. J. Bot. 5: 112-9.
  • Santamour, F. S. 1983. Woody-plant succession in the urban forest: filling cracks and crevices. J. Arboric. 9(10): 267-70. (Woody spp. on abandoned brick kilns)
  • Senchina, D. S. 2006. Ethnobotany of poison ivy, poison oak, and relatives (<em>Toxicodendron</em> spp., Anacardiaceae) in America; veracity of historical accounts. Rhodora 108: 203-227.
  • Sievers, A. F.; Clarke, I. D. 1944. Preliminary studies of the cultivation of American sumac as a source of tannin. Amer. Leather Chem. Assoc. J. 39: 293-319.
  • Smith, H. K. 1970. The biology, wildlife use and management of sumac in the lower peninsula of Michigan. Ph.D. Dissertation Michigan State Univ., East Lansing, MI,
  • Sprague, T. A. 1929. The correct spelling of certain generic names. IV. Kew Bull. 1929: 38-52.
  • Stephenson, A. G. 1977. The chemical inhibition of competitors by smooth sumac (<em>Rhus glabra</em>). Michigan Bot. 16: 15-8.
  • Stoll, R. J. et.al. 1980. Foods of ruffed grouse <em>Bonasa umbellus</em> in Ohio USA. Ohio Fish Wildlife Rep. 1980: 1-18.
  • Sudworth, G. B. 1892. On the names of two species of <em>Rhus</em>. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 19: 79-81.
  • Sullivan, J. 1994. <em>Rhus typhina</em>. ()
  • Suthers, H. B. et.al. 2000. Use of successional habitat and fruit resources by songbirds during autumn migration in central New Jersey. Wilson Bull. 112: 249-260.
  • Sweet, H. R.; Barkley, F. A. 1936. A most useful plant family, the Anacardiaceae. Missouri Bot. Gard. Bull. 24: 216-29.
  • Talley, S. M.; Lawton, R. O.; Setzer, W. N. 1996. Host preferences of <em>Rhus radicans</em> (Anacardiaceae) in a southern deciduous hardwood forest. Ecology 77: 1271-6.
  • Tanchev, S. S.; Timberlake, C. F. 1969. Anthocyanins in leaves of <em>Cotinus coggygria</em>. Phytochemistry 8: 65-83.
  • Terrazas-Salgado, T. S. 1996. Wood anatomy of the Anacardiaceae: ecological and phylogenetic interpretation. Ph.D. Dissertation Univ. North Carolina, Chapel Hill,
  • Tirmenstein, D. 1987. <em>Rhus aromatica</em>. ()
  • Tirmenstein, D. A. 1987. <em>Rhus glabra</em>. ()
  • Tripp, K. E. 1994. Considering <em>Cotinus</em>. Arnoldia (Jamaica Plain) 54: 21-30.
  • Uttal, L. J. 1984. An environmental race of <em>Rhus aromatica</em> Ait. in western Virginia. Jeffersonia 15: 75-6.
  • Vassilyev, A. E. 2000. Quantitative ultrastructural data of secretory duct epithelial cells in <em>Rhus toxicodendron</em>. Int. J. Plant Sci. 161: 615-630.
  • Wannan, B. S. 2006. Analysis of generic relationships in Anacardiaceae. Blumea 51: 165-195.
  • Wannan, B. S.; Quinn, C. J. 1990. Pericarp structure and generic affinities in the Anacardiaceae. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 102: 225-52.
  • Wannan, B. S.; Quinn, C. J. 1991. Floral structure and evolution in the Anacardiaceae. J. Linn. Soc. Bot. 107(4): 349-85.
  • Weathers, K. C.; Siccama, T. G. 1986. A comparison of nutrient concentration in two poisonous and three nonpoisonous species of sumac (<em>Rhus</em> spp.). Amer. Midl. Naturalist 116: 209-12.
  • Werner, P. A.; Harbeck, A. L. 1982. The pattern of tree seedling establishment relative to staghorn sumac cover in Michigan old fields. Amer. Midl. Naturalist 108: 124-32.
  • Willson, M. F.; Thompson, J. N. 1982. Phenology and ecology of color in bird-dispersed fruits, or why some fruits are red when they are "green". Canad. J. Bot. 60: 701-3.
  • Yi, T. et.al. 2007. Phylogeny of <em>Rhus</em> (Anacardiaceae) based on sequences of nuclear Nia-13 intron and chloroplast trnC-trnD. Syst. Bot. 32: 379-391.
  • Young, D. A. 1979. Heartwood flavonoids and the infrageneric relationships of <em>Rhus</em> (Anacardiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 66: 502-510.
  • Young, D. A. 1975. Systematics of <em>Rhus</em> subgenus <em>Lobadium</em> section <em>Styphonia</em>. Ph.D. Dissertation Claremont Univ., Claremont, CA,
  • Zhang, J.; Maun, M. A. 1994. Potential for seed bank formation in seven Great Lakes sand dune species. Amer. J. Bot. 81(4): 387-94.
  • Ziska, L. H. et.al. 2007. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide and potential impacts on the growth and toxicity of poison ivy (<em>Toxicodendron radicans</em>). Weed Science 55: 288-292.