New York Metropolitan Flora

Genus: Castanea

Castanea dentata Castanea pumila Castanea sativa

By Steven D. Glenn

Not peer reviewed

Last Modified 02/01/2013

Back to Fagaceae

Nomenclature

Castanea Mill., Gard. Dict. Abr. ed. 4. 1754. LECTOTYPE: C. sativa Mill. (see Britton & A.Br., Ill. Fl. N.U.S. ed. 2. 1: 615. 1913).

[Fagus L., Sp. Pl. 997. 1753, p. p.]

Fagus Castanea Weston, Bot. Univ. 1: 107. 1770. TYPE: unknown.

Castanophorum Neck., Elem. Bot. 3: 257. 1790. TYPE: unknown.

Castanea subgen. Eucastanea Koehne, Deut. Dendrol. 121. 1893. TYPE: unknown.

Castanea sect. Eucastanea, sect. Balanocastanon & sect. Hypocastanon Dode, Bull. Soc. Dendrol. France, 1908: 140. 1908. TYPE: unknown.

List of Castanea Species

References to Castanea

  • Abrams, M. D.; Kubiske, M. E.; Mostoller, S. A. 1994. Relating wet and dry year ecophysiology to leaf structure in contrasting temperate tree species. Ecology 75: 123-33.
  • Anagnostakis, S. L. 1987. Chestnut blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen. Mycologia 79: 23-27.
  • Anagnostakis, S. L. 1996. The Chestnut Story. ()
  • Anagnostakis, S. L. 1978. The American chestnut: new hope for a fallen giant. Connecticut Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 777: 1-9.
  • Anagnostakis, S. L.; Hillman, B. 1992. Evolution of the chestnut tree and its blight. Arnoldia (Jamaica Plain) 52: 2-10.
  • Anderson, A. B. 1955. Recovery and utilization of tree extractives. Econ. Bot. 9(2): 108-40.
  • Beattie, R. K.; Diller, J. D. 1954. Fifty years of chestnut blight in America. J. Forest. 52: 323-9.
  • Brett, D. W. 1964. The inflorescence of Fagus and Castanea and the evolution of the cupules of the Fagaceae. New Phyt. 63: 96-117.
  • Brewer, L. G. 1995. Ecology of survival and recovery from blight in American chestnut trees (Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh.) in Michigan. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 122: 40-57.
  • Brooks, A. B. 1937. Castanea dentata. Castanea 2: 61-7.
  • Carpenter, S. B.; Smith, N. D. 1975. Stomatal distribution and size in southern Appalachian hardwoods. Canad. J. Bot. 53: 1153-6.
  • Carpenter, S. B.; Smith, N. D. 1979. Variation in shade leaf thickness among urban trees growing in metropolitan Lexington, Kentucky. Castanea 44: 94-8.
  • Carter, J. C. 1975. Major tree diseases of the century. J. Arboric. 1(8): 141-7.
  • Celakovsky, L. 1890. Ueber die Cupula von Fagus und Castanea. Jahrb. Wiss. Bot. 21: 128-161. (In German)
  • Clapper, R. B. 1954. Chestnut breeding, techniques and results. I. Breeding material and pollination techniques. J. Heredity 45: 107-14.
  • Clinton, G. P. 1913. Chestnut bark disease. Connecticut Agr. Exp. Sta. Rep. 1912: 359-453.
  • Croxton, W. C. 1939. A study of the tolerance of trees to breakage by ice accumulation. Ecology 20: 71-3. (spp. table reprinted in Arborist's News 4(3):24. 1939.)
  • Dane, F. et.al. 2003. Intercontinental genetic divergence of Castanea species in eastern Asia and eastern North America. Heredity 91: 314-321.
  • Dietz, A. 1978. The use of ionizing radiation to develop a blight resistant American chestnut Castanea dentata, through induced mutations. In: Proceedings of the American Chestnut Symposium, Morgantown, WV, Jan. 4-5, 1978. West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV. , 17-20 pages.
  • Diller, J. D. 1956. Is our American chestnut developing blight resistance? Northern Nut Growers Ann. Rept. 47: 29-31.
  • Diller, J. D. 1965. Chestnut blight.
  • Elias, T. S. 1971. The genera of Fagaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor. 52: 159-95.
  • Exum, E. M. 1992. Tree in a coma. Amer. Forests 98(11-12): 20-5.
  • Fey, B. S.; Endress, P. K. 1983. Development and morphological interpretation of the cupule in Fagaceae. Flora 173: 451-468.
  • Forest, H. S. 1978. The American chestnut in New York. Conservationist 33(1): 25-6. (NY Dept. Envir. Conserv., July-August)
  • Forest, H. S.; Kely, J. W.; Wiedman, C. P. 1977. The American chestnut: a rare regional tree species. The Rochester Committee for Scientific Information Bulletin 203: 1-12.
  • Forman, L. L. 1966. On the evolution of cupules in the Fagaceae. Kew Bull. 18: 385-419.
  • Foster, D. R.; Zebryk, T. M. 1993. Long-term vegetation dynamics and disturbance history of a Tsuga-dominated forest in New England. Ecology 74: 982-98.
  • Frascaria, N.; Maggia, L.; Michaud, M.; Bousquet, J. 1993. The rbcL gene sequence from chestnut indicates a slow rate of evolution in the Fagaceae. Genome 36: 668-71.
  • Fu, Y.; Dane, F. 2003. Allozyme variation in endangered Castanea pumila var. pumila. Ann. Bot. (London) 92: 223-230.
  • Gao, S. 1995. Effects of water stress on chestnut blight. Canad. J. Forest Res. 25: 1030-1035.
  • Good, N. F. 1968. A study of natural replacement of chestnut in six stands in the highlands of New Jersey. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 95: 240-53. (Also Acer, Betula, & Fagus)
  • Good, N. F.; Good, R. E. 1972. Population dynamics of tree seedlings and saplings in a mature eastern hardwood forest. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 99: 172-8.
  • Graves, A. H. 1926. The cause of the persistent development of basal shoots from blighted chestnut trees. Phytopathology 16: 615-21. (also reprinted in Brooklyn Botanic Garden Contributions No. 47. 1926)
  • Graves, A. H. 1961. Keys to chestnut species. Northern Nut Growers Ann. Rept. 52: 78-90.
  • Graves, A. H. 1918. Resistance in the American chestnut to the bark disease. Science 48: 652-3.
  • Graves, H. S. 1905. Notes on the rate of growth of red cedar, red oak, and chestnut. Forest. Quart. 3: 349-53.
  • Griffin, G. J. 1992. American chestnut survival in understory mesic sites following the chestnut blight pandemic. Canad. J. Bot. 70(10): 1950-6.
  • Griffin, G. J.; Smith, H. C.; Dietz, A.; Elkins, J. R. 1991. Importance of hardwood competition to American chestnut survival, growth, and blight development in forest clearcuts. Canad. J. Bot. 69(8): 1804-9.
  • Grime, J. P.; Jeffrey, D. W. 1965. Seedling establishment in vertical gradients of sunlight. J. Ecol. 53(3): 621-42.
  • Groome, P. C. et.al. 2001. Bacteria found on American chestnut bark and their potential in biocontrol of chestnut blight. Arboric. J. 25: 221-234.
  • Hardin, J. W.; Johnson, G. P. 1985. Atlas of foliar surface features in woody plants, VIII. Fagus and Castanea (Fagaceae) of eastern North America. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 112: 11-20.
  • Hollick, A. 1907. The chestnut disease on Staten Island. Proc. Staten Island Assoc. Arts 2: 125.
  • Huang, H.; Dane, F.; Kubisiak, T. L. 1998. Allozyme and RAPD analysis of the genetic diversity and geographic variation in wild populations of the American chestnut (Fagaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 85: 1013-1021.
  • Huntwork, J. E. 1994. The majestic American chestnut, A history and cookbook. Author, Cadillac, MI.
  • Hutchinson, A. H. 1918. Limiting factors in relation to specific ranges of tolerance of forest trees. Bot. Gaz. 66: 465-93.
  • Isenberg, I. H. 1956. Papermaking fibers. Econ. Bot. 10(2): 176-93.
  • Jackson, L. W. R.; Driver, C. H. 1969. Morphology of mycorrhizae on deciduous forest tree species. Castanea 34: 230-5.
  • Jaynes, R. A. 1962. Chestnut chromosomes. Forest Sci. 8: 372-7.
  • Jaynes, R. A. 1964. Interspecific crosses in the genus Castanea. Silvae Genet. 13: 146-54.
  • Jaynes, R. A. (eds.) (1969): 1969. Handbook of North American nut trees. Northern Nut Growers Association, Knoxville, TN. , 421 pages.
  • Johnson, G. P. 1985. Revision of Castanea sect. Balanocastanon. Ph.D. Dissertation North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
  • Johnson, G. P. 1988. Revision of Castanea sect. Balanocastanon (Fagaceae). J. Arnold Arbor. 69(1): 25-49. (see also Ph.D. dissertation, North Carolina State Univ., Raleigh, NC. 1985.)
  • Jones, J. H. 1986. Evolution of the Fagaceae: the implications of foliar features. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 228-75.
  • Kaul, R. B. 1986. Evolution and reproductive biology of inflorescences in Lithocarpus, Castanopsis, Castanea and Quercus (Fagaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 73: 284-96.
  • Kaul, R. B.; Abbe, E. C. 1984. Inflorescence architecture and evolution in the Fagaceae. J. Arnold Arbor. 65: 375-401.
  • King, D. A. 2003. Allocation of above-ground growth Is related to light in temperate deciduous saplings. Funct. Ecol. 17: 482-488.
  • Korstian, C. F.; Stickel, P. W. 1927. The natural replacement of blight-killed chestnut in hardwood forests of the northeast. J. Agric. Res. 34: 631-48.
  • Langdon, L. M. 1949. The Castaneae, variations of floral and inflorescence morphology. (Abstr.). Amer. J. Bot. 36: 798.
  • Latham, R. E. 1992. Co-occurring tree species change rank in seedling performance with resources varied experimentally. Ecology 73: 2129-44.
  • Lauriault, J. 1994. The American chestnut (Castanea dentata): A tree almost decimated in a few decades. Global Biodiversity 4(2): 12-5.
  • Long Island Botanical Society Flora Committee. 2001. Preliminary Atlas of the Fagaceae of Long Island, New York. Long Island Botanical Society Newsletter 11: 1, 6-9.
  • Manos, P. S.; Stanford, A. M. 2001. The historical biogeography of Fagaceae: tracking the Tertiary history of temperate and subtropical forests of the Northern Hemisphere. Int. J. Plant Sci. 162: S77-S93.
  • Martin, W. L.; Sharik, T. L.; Oderwald, R. G.; Smith, D. W. 1982. Phytomass: structural relationships for woody plant species in the understory of an Appalachian oak forest. Canad. J. Bot. 60: 1923-7.
  • Mattoon, W. R. 1909. The origin and early development of chestnut sprouts. Forest. Quart. 7: 34-7.
  • Maycock, P. F. 1963. The phytosociology of the deciduous forests of extreme southern Ontario. Canad. J. Bot. 41: 379-438.
  • McInteer, B. B. 1947. Soil preference of some plants as seen in Kentucky. Castanea 12: 1-8.
  • Meurer-Grimes, B. 1995. New evidence for the systematic significance of acylated spermidines and flavonoids in pollen of higher Hamamelidae. Brittonia 47(2): 130-42.
  • Morris, R. T. 1914. Chestnut blight resistance. J. Heredity 5: 26-9.
  • Murrill, W. A. 1906. A serious chestnut disease. J. New York Bot. Gard. 7: 143-53.
  • Nelson, R. M. 1932. Growth and mortality of chestnut sprouts. J. Forest. 30: 872-3.
  • Okamoto, M. 1989. A comparative study of the ontogenetic development of the cupules in Castanea and Lithocarpus (Fagaceae). Pl. Syst. Evol. 168(1-2): 7-18.
  • Paillet, F. L. 1984. Growth-form and ecology of American chestnut sprout clones in northeastern Massachusetts. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 111: 316-28.
  • Paillet, F. L. 1988. Character and distribution of American chestnut sprouts in southern New England woodlands. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 115: 32-44.
  • Paillet, F. L. 1982. Ecological significance of American chestnut in the Holocene forests of Connecticut. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 109(4): 457-73.
  • Paillet, F. L. 2002. Chestnut: History and ecology of a transformed species. J. Biogeogr. 29: 1517-1530.
  • Paillet, F. L. 1993. Growth form and life histories of American chestnut and Allegheny and Ozark chinquapin at various North American sites. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 120: 257-68.
  • Paillet, F. L.; Rutter, P. A. 1989. Replacement of native oak and hickory tree species by the introduced American chesnut Castanea dentata in southwestern Wisconsin, USA. Canad. J. Bot. 67: 3457-69.
  • Parker, G. G. et.al. 1993. Decline of understory American chestnut (Castanea dentata) in a southern Appalachian forest. Canad. J. Forest Res. 23: 259-265.
  • Potente, J. 2003. Retrieving the American chestnut. Long Island Botanical Society Newsletter 13: 1, 4-11.
  • Reynolds, D. L.; Burke, K. L. 2011. The effect of growth rate, age, and chesnut blight on American chestnut mortality. Castanea 76: 129-139.
  • Rowlee, W. W.; Hastings, G. T. 1898. The seeds and seedlings of some Amentiferae. Bot. Gaz. 26: 349-53.
  • Rudkin, W. H. 1880. A large chestnut tree. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 7: 81.
  • Russell, E. W. B. 1987. Pre-blight distribution of Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 114: 183-90.
  • Schaberg, P. G. et.al. 2009. Is nut cold tolerance a limitation to the restoration of American chestnut in the northeastern United States? Ecological Restoration 27: 266-268.
  • Schwadron, P. A. 1995. Distribution and persistence of American Chestnut sprouts, Castanea dentata (Marsh.) Borkh., in northeastern Ohio woodlands. Ohio J. Science 95: 281-288.
  • Stilwell, K. L. et.al. 2003. Heterozygote advantage in the American chestnut, Castanea dentata (Fagaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 90: 207-213.
  • Stout, A. B. 1926. Why are chestnuts self-fruitless? J. New York Bot. Gard. 27: 154-8.
  • Stout, A. B. 1928. Dichogamy in flowering plants. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 55: 141-53.
  • Sudworth, G. B. 1892. On the name of the American chestnut. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 19: 152-4.
  • Sullivan, J. 1994. Castanea pumila. ()
  • Tattar, T. A. et.al. 1996. Biocontrol of the chestnut blight fungus Cryphonectria parasitica. Arboric. J. 20: 449-469.
  • Vilkomerson, H. 1941. Flowering habits of the chestnut. Northern Nut Growers Ann. Rept. 31: 114-6.
  • Wang, P. L.; Chang, K. T. 1991. The pollen morphology in relation to the taxonomy and phylogeny of Fagaceae. Acta Phytotax. Sin. 29(1): 60-6. (In Chinese; English summary)
  • Willut, J.; Marks, G.; Hicks, G. 1977. Naturally occurring mature American chestnut trees in northwest Indiana. Proc. Indiana Acad. Sci. 86: 127-30.
  • Woodroof, J. G. 1979. Tree nuts: production, processing, products. AVI Publ. Co., Westport, CT. , 731 pages.
  • Woods, F. W.; Shanks, R. E. 1959. Natural replacement of chestnut in the Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ecology 40: 349-61.